Search Results for "resettlement"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to Deemed Conveyance in Favor ...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Act Case — Upholds Appointment ...
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder Under Section 302 I...
High Court of Bombay Quashes Deputy Registrar's Directives in Co-operative Socie...

Search Results for "resettlement"

382 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 382 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Land Acquisition Compensation Enhancement Petitions Under National Highways Act — Held That Reference Court Must Consider Market Value Based on Sale Deeds and Potential of Land, Not Merely Government Rates. Claimants Entitled to Additional Amounts Under Land Acquisition Act.

8 May 2026

The judgment concerns three writ petitions filed by legal heirs of deceased landowners whose agricultural lands were acquired for the construction of ...

High Court

High Court Refers Writ Petition to Larger Bench Due to Conflict on MRTP Act Reservation Lapsing. Dispute Involves Whether Notice Under Section 127 Served Before Plan Revision Lapses Upon Finalisation of Revised Development Plan Under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

27 Mar 2026

The judgment pertains to a writ petition filed by an agriculturist challenging the reservation of his land for a primary school under the Maharashtra ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs State to Decide Compensation Application in Land Acquisition Case — Failure to Issue Section 6 Notification Does Not Bar Compensation for Dispossessed Landowner. The Court held that the State cannot deny compensation to a landowner whose land has been taken over without following the procedure under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, and delay and laches cannot be raised as a defence in such circumstances.

18 Dec 2025

The petitioner, Balasaheb Sopan Dorge, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, seeking dire...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Land Acquisition Award for Violation of Mandatory 30-Day Notice Period Under Section 21(2) of RFCTLARR Act, 2013. Failure to Provide Minimum Notice and Personal Hearing Vitiates the Award Despite Filing of Objections.

7 Mar 2025

The petitioners, Shree Nasik Panchavati Panjrapole and its trustees, challenged the land acquisition award dated 23 November 2023 passed by the Distri...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Owners in TDR Dispute — Upholds Godrej & Boyce I and Holds 2016 Amendment Prospective. The Court ruled that the right to 100% TDR for constructing amenities vests upon surrender and development, and the 2016 amendment to Regulation 34 of DCR, 1991 cannot operate retrospectively to defeat that right.

20 Sep 2024

The Supreme Court of India heard a batch of civil appeals arising from three judgments of the Bombay High Court concerning the entitlement of owners/l...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Lapse Case — Subsequent Purchaser Cannot Invoke Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act. The Court held that a person who purchases land after the acquisition process is complete has no locus standi to claim lapse of acquisition under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.

18 May 2023

The case involves an appeal by the Government of NCT of Delhi against an order of the High Court of Delhi allowing a writ petition filed by the respon...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Land Acquisition Case, Reversing High Court's Lapse Declaration. Consent Award Under Section 11 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Remains Valid Despite Land Owner's Refusal to Accept Compensation, Precluding Deemed Lapse Under Section 24(2) of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.

17 Mar 2023

The dispute arose from land acquisition proceedings initiated under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 for resettlement of Narmada Project oustees. The re...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Directs Investigation and Management of Shri Jagannath Temple, Puri — Ratna Bhandar Keys Disappearance and Pilgrim Facilities Addressed. Court Orders Reports from District Judge, State, and Central Governments, and Appoints Amicus Curiae for Temple Preservation and Management Under Article 32 of the Constitution.

4 Nov 2019

The Supreme Court of India was approached by way of a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India by the petitioner, Mrinalini Padhi, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Land Acquisition for Power Project Under MID Act and Rehabilitation Act — Acquisition Held Valid for Public Purpose of Augmenting Power Supply. The court upheld the notifications under Sections 32 and 33 of the Maharashtra Industrial Development Act, 1961 and Sections 11, 13, 14 of the Maharashtra Project Affected Persons Rehabilitation Act, 1986 for acquisition of agricultural land for a 1600 MW coastal power plant.

4 Apr 2012

The petitioners, residents of Taluka Alibag, District Raigad, challenged the acquisition of their agricultural lands for a 1600 MW Coastal Power Plant...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Land Acquisition for Rehabilitation of Project Affected Persons. Notification under Section 11 of Maharashtra Project Affected Persons Rehabilitation Act, 1986 and Land Acquisition Act, 1894 upheld as valid.

17 Aug 2005

The petitioners, Shri Balshiram Khandu Pawale and Shri Baban Khandu Pawale, residents of Village Kalus, Taluka Khed, District Pune, filed a Writ Petit...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)