Search Results for "reopening of assessment"

147 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 147 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice in Income Tax Case Due to Lack of Fresh Material Beyond Four Years. Unabsorbed Depreciation Set-Off and Book Profit Adjustments Under Section 115JB of Income Tax Act, 1961 Not Justified for Reopening.

The petitioner, Voltas Limited, filed a writ petition challenging a notice dated 30 March 2011 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Quashing Reopening of Assessment Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Year 2004-05. Mere Change of Opinion Cannot Justify Reopening When All Material Facts Were Disclosed During Original Assessment Under Section 143(3).

The petitioner, Shri Mahila Griha Udyog Lijjat Papad, a society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1960 and the Bombay Public Trust Act,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Fresh Material. Reimbursement of Expenses Disclosed in Return and Application Under Section 195(2) Sought, No Failure to Disclose Material Facts.

The petitioner, Monitor India Pvt. Ltd., a subsidiary of a Dutch company, challenged a notice dated 22 March 2011 issued under Section 148 of the Inco...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice Under Section 148 for Lack of Fresh Material. Reassessment Based on Mere Change of Opinion on Exemption Under Section 10(38) of Income Tax Act, 1961 is Invalid.

The Petitioner, General Insurance Corporation of India, a public sector general insurance company, filed a return of income for Assessment Year 2006-0...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice Under Section 148 Income Tax Act for Mere Change of Opinion. Assessment Completed Under Section 143(3) Cannot Be Reopened Without Fresh Tangible Material.

The petitioner, Sanand Properties Pvt. Ltd., filed a return for Assessment Year 2008-09 declaring income of Rs.20.33 lakhs, later revised to Rs.19.14 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Failure to Disclose Material Facts. Reassessment after four years invalid as reasons recorded did not allege any failure by assessee to disclose fully and truly all material facts.

The petitioner, ICICI Bank Ltd., challenged a notice dated 30 March 2010 issued by the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax under Section 148 of the Inco...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice in Income Tax Case Due to Lack of Fresh Material. Loan Waiver Amount Already Disclosed During Original Assessment Cannot Be Reopened Under Section 147 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Without New Information.

The Petitioner, Kimplas Trenton Fittings Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging a notice dated 25 March 2011 issued under Section 148 of the Income T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Reopening Case — Reopening Invalid Due to Change of Opinion. Tribunal's finding that reassessment notice was based on mere change of opinion upheld under Section 147 of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The case pertains to an appeal by the Revenue against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) which held that the reopening of assessmen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Lack of Fresh Material. Assessment Reopened Beyond Four Years Based on Same Facts Already Considered During Original Assessment Under Section 143(3) — Held That Change of Opinion Does Not Justify Reopening.

The petitioner, Sanand Properties Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging a notice dated 11 January 2011 is...