Search Results for "rashness and negligence"

302 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 302 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Electrocution Death Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Negligence. Barbed Fencing with Electric Current Not Proved to be Rash or Negligent Act Under Section 304-A IPC.

The appellant, Jagannatha @ Muniyappa, was convicted by the I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Bangalore Rural District, in Spl.C. No.102/2006 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Fatal Road Accident Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Rash or Negligent Driving. Conviction under Sections 279, 338, and 304-A IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilty Mind Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The revision petitioner, Manasing Tukaram Lamani, was the accused in C.C. No. 208/2011 before the Principal Civil Judge and JMFC, Bagalkot. He was con...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Conviction for Rash Driving Causing Death of Two Children. Concurrent findings of fact by trial and appellate courts under Sections 279, 304-A IPC and Section 184 Motor Vehicles Act upheld as not perverse.

The applicant, Shamrao Arma, was convicted by the trial court for offences under Sections 279 (rash driving) and 304-A (causing death by negligence) o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Doctor in Medical Negligence Case — Lack of Expert Opinion and Prima Facie Evidence. Section 304(A) IPC Proceedings Set Aside as Complaint Did Not Disclose Essential Ingredients of Rash or Negligent Act Causing Death.

The petitioner, Dr. Rajeshwari, a medical practitioner, sought quashing of the order dated 19.08.2013 passed by the JMFC-II, Raichur, in FIR No.669/20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Against Conviction for Rash Driving and Causing Death by Negligence — Confirms Concurrent Findings of Guilt Under Sections 279 and 304A IPC.

The revision petitioner, Kishor N, was convicted by the Metropolitan Magistrate Traffic Court IV, Bengaluru, in C.C.No.7848/2018 for offences under Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal in Swimming Pool Drowning Case — Acquittal Upheld for Lack of Proof of Rash or Negligent Act. Section 304A IPC requires direct causal link between a positive act of rashness or negligence and death; mere omission or lack of supervision not sufficient.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order dated 30.01.2009 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Court No.8), Akola i...