Search Results for "railway negligence"

212 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 212 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Police Officers in Custodial Death Case Due to Lack of Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC. Prosecution for alleged murder and torture during custody fails as prior sanction for prosecution of public servants was not obtained, rendering the proceedings invalid.

The judgment pertains to two criminal writ petitions filed by police officers seeking quashing of an FIR registered by the Central Bureau of Investiga...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Reverses Railway Claims Tribunal Decision, Awards Rs. 8 Lakhs in Compensation for Untoward Incident. The appellant, mistakenly boarding the wrong train and sustaining injuries, was deemed a bona fide passenger eligible for compensation under the Railways Act, 1989.

This appeal, filed under Section 23 of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987, challenges the judgment of the Railway Claims Tribunal, Nagpur Bench, wh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim Case — Mother of Deceased Entitled to Compensation Under Railways Act. Tribunal Erred in Dismissing Claim on Ground of Non-Existence of Deceased as Passenger, Despite Evidence of Accidental Fall from Train.

The appellant, Ranjanabai Tukaram Jatale, mother of deceased Suresh Tukaram Jatale, filed a claim application before the Railway Claims Tribunal, Nagp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Awards Compensation for Medical Negligence in Municipal Hospital - Extravasation Injury Leads to Loss of Fingers. Hospital Staff's Failure to Monitor IV Line Constitutes Negligence, Municipal Corporation Held Vicariously Liable.

The petitioner, Umakant Kisan Mane, was admitted to Rajawadi Municipal Hospital on 1st October 2002 following a convulsion. An intravenous line was st...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Parents' Appeal in Railway Accident Compensation Case — Holds That 'Accidental Falling' Includes Falling Due to Dizziness or Fits, Not Only Bumping Against Objects. Tribunal Erred in Narrow Interpretation of 'Accidental Falling' Under Section 124A of Railways Act, 1989.

The appellants, parents of the deceased Arvind Sanas, filed an appeal against the judgment of the Railway Claims Tribunal, Mumbai Bench, which dismiss...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Consumer Forum Compensation for Railway Death Due to Negligence in Providing Safe Travel. Railway Administration Held Liable for Death of Passenger Thrown from Train by Miscreants as Deficiency in Service Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

The Union of India, through the General Manager of South Central Railway, filed a writ petition challenging an order of the District Consumer Disputes...