Search Results for "railway administration"

842 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 842 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Retired Railway Employee's Petition for Inclusion of Apprenticeship Period as Qualifying Service for Pension. Gap of 45 Days Between Completion of Apprenticeship and Regular Posting Breaks Continuity, Disentitling Claim for Pensionary Benefits.

The petitioner, a retired Railway employee, was appointed as an Apprentice Telecom Inspector on 23/12/1964 and completed his two-year apprenticeship o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Dismissal of Railway Employee for Overcharging Decoy Passenger in Disciplinary Proceedings. Central Administrative Tribunal's Order of Reinstatement Set Aside as Disciplinary Authority's Discretion Not Vitiated by Non-Supply of Enquiry Report.

The case involves a disciplinary action against a railway employee, Moni Shankar, who was a Booking Supervisor. He was appointed as a Trains Clerk in ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Discharge of Accused in Railway Property Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Knowledge. Possession of railway property without proof of knowledge or reason to believe it is railway property does not attract Section 3(a) of Railway Property (Unlawful Possession) Act, 1966.

The petitioner, Bhagwat Rajaram Patil, was the owner of a rolling mill at Manyarkheda, Jalgaon. On 18 July 1999, the Railway Protection Force (RPF) co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Railway's Appeal Against Compensation Award for Amputation of Fingers Due to Overcrowding. Compensation of Rs.1,20,000 under Railway Accidents and Untoward Incidents (Compensation) Amendment Rules, 1997 for untoward incident held proper.

The appellant, Union of India through General Manager, challenged the judgment and award dated 17 July 2005 passed by the Railway Accident Claims Trib...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Mandamus Directing Finalization of RPF as Organized Service. In-Principle Approval by DoPT Was Conditional and Subject to Cadre Review Committee Approval, Which Was Not Granted.

The Supreme Court disposed of a batch of appeals filed by the Union of India against judgments of the Delhi High Court that had directed the governmen...