Search Results for "provisional appointment"

303 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 303 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Tribunal Order in Police Recruitment Case — Squint Eye Condition Not Absolute Bar. Squint eye condition does not automatically disqualify a candidate for police ministerial services; medical fitness must be assessed on merits.

The petitioner, Chetankumar M.N., applied for recruitment to the Karnataka State Police (Ministerial Services). He was found to have a squint eye, and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Appointment of Director in BESCOM Board Without Hearing. Impugned Order Quashed for Violation of Principles of Natural Justice Under Article 226 of Constitution of India.

The petitioner, G Ashok Kumar, was working as Managing Director of Karnataka Vidyuth Karkane and was also a nominated Director (Technical) on the Boar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals Against High Court Order Quashing Selection Process for Technical Assistant Posts. Revision of Category-Wise Vacancies After Written Examination Does Not Change Rules of the Game When Done to Fulfill Reservation Mandates.

The Supreme Court heard appeals against a High Court judgment that quashed the selection process for 6628 posts of Technical Assistant (Group-C) in th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Transfer Order of Agricultural Officer on Grounds of Malafides and Violation of Transfer Policy. Transfer Order Quashed as It Was Not in Public Interest and Was Motivated to Accommodate Another Officer.

The petitioner, Sandeep Dashrath Shirsath, was working as an Agricultural Officer at Panchayat Samiti Paithan, Aurangabad. He was transferred by an or...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Termination of Probationary Employees in MSETCL — Probation Period Extended Validly Under Service Rules. Termination of Probationer Without Stigma Upheld as Employer's Discretion Under Regulation 11 of MSETCL Service Regulations.

The petitioners, Chandrashekhar Tukarampant Madankar, Anup Udhav Lokhande, and Harshal Radheshyam Malewar, were appointed as Junior Engineers (Electri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Seniority List in Agricultural University — Directs Reassignment of Placement Based on Continuous Length of Service. Seniority Determined by Continuous Service from Date of Appointment, Not Date of Confirmation.

The petitioner, Tulshidas Baliram Bastewad, an Associate Professor at Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, Rahuri, challenged the final seniority list of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Termination of Probationary Employees in MSETCL — Termination During Probation Valid Without Stigma or Mala Fides. Probationer has no right to the post and termination simpliciter during probation does not attract principles of natural justice.

The judgment concerns three writ petitions filed by probationary employees of the Maharashtra State Electricity Transmission Company Ltd (MSETCL) chal...