Search Results for "promotion orders"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "promotion orders"

1924 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1924 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Petitions Challenging CAT Directions on Promotion to General Manager (Open Line) — Employer's Delay and Contradictory Stand Negate Requirement of DRM Experience. Court Holds That Under Indian Railway Establishment Rules, 1986, Working as Divisional Railway Manager Is Not a Mandatory Eligibility Condition, and Employer Cannot Set Up Its Own Wrong to Deny Consideration for Promotion.

4 Sep 2017

The dispute arose from the denial of promotion to the post of General Manager (Open Line) to an officer of the Indian Railways. The officer had faced ...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Union of India's Challenge to CAT Order Directing Promotion of Retired Employee Under Restructuring Scheme — Delay in Consideration Attributable to Employer, Not Employee.

17 Apr 2017

The petitioner, Union of India through the General Manager, Ordnance Factory Ambarnath, challenged an order of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Bo...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Preference for Direct Recruit Assistants Over Non-Graduate Promotees in Tamil Nadu Revenue Subordinate Service. Rule Read Down to Exclude Graduate Promotees from Discrimination.

12 Mar 2019

The case involves a dispute over the implementation of amended Rule 5(g) and Annexure-III item (ii) of the Tamil Nadu Revenue Subordinate Service Rule...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Promotion in State Excise Department — Seniority and Eligibility Determined by Recruitment Rules and Select List. The court upheld the Tribunal's dismissal of the challenge to promotion of respondents to Joint Commissioner post, finding petitioner not eligible as per select list.

25 Jul 2017

The petitioner, Pratapsinh Damodar Golekar, a Deputy Commissioner of State Excise, filed Original Application No.220 of 1995 before the Maharashtra Ad...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Seniority Dispute Among Promoted Officers in Telecommunications Engineering Service. ROTA Rule Not Applicable Where Statutory Recruitment Rules Do Not Provide for Rotation of Vacancies Between Quota Streams.

2 Apr 2019

The appeal arose from a dispute over the inter se seniority of Sub-Divisional Engineers (SDEs) in the Telecommunications Engineering Service (Group 'B...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Denial of Promotion Due to Minor Penalty — Government Policy Upheld. Clause B of GR dated 15.12.2017, which denies promotion during currency of penalty, is not violative of Articles 14, 16, and 20(2) of the Constitution.

30 Apr 2020

The petitioner, Mohan Vasantrao Sangvikar, a Sub-Divisional Engineer in the Public Works Department, challenged the order of the Maharashtra Administr...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Judicial Officers Denied Promotion Despite Qualifying Suitability Test — Notional Promotion Granted from Date of Junior Officers' Appointment. The Court held that for the 65% promotional quota under the Jharkhand Superior Judicial Services (Recruitment, Appointment and Condition of Service) Rule, 2001, once a candidate qualifies the suitability test, promotion cannot be denied solely on the basis of a comparative merit list.

15 Jan 2025

The present appeal arose from a judgment dated 29.06.2022 of the High Court of Jharkhand, which dismissed a writ petition filed by the appellants, thr...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Allows Promotion Claim Due to Non-Communication of APARs — IRCTC Promotion Policy Benchmark Quashed as Arbitrary. The court held that non-communication of Annual Performance Appraisal Reports before using them to deny promotion violates principles of natural justice, and directed reconsideration of promotion without considering uncommunicated APARs.

5 Jan 2026

The petitioner, Susheel Patil, an employee of Indian Railway Catering and Tourism Corporation Ltd (IRCTC), filed a petition under Articles 14, 16 and ...

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses State Appeal, Directs Consideration for Promotion Despite Past Punishment. Government Check-Period Instruction Held Inoperative as Punishment Period Had Expired by Crucial Date.

13 Feb 2025

(1) Background: The dispute concerned the denial of promotion to the post of Deputy Tahsildar in the Revenue Department of Tamil Nadu. The respondent,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Promotion of Senior Employee in Municipal Corporation Service Dispute. Seniority Based on Initial Appointment Date Prevails Over Reservation Claim for Scheduled Caste Candidate.

20 Jul 2023

The case involves a dispute between Babasaheb Bhau Kamble (Petitioner) and Ganesh Shankar Deshpande (Respondent No.4) over promotion to the post of He...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)