Search Results for "pre-trap panchanama"

50 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 50 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Sanction and Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as demand and acceptance of bribe not proved beyond reasonable doubt.

The case pertains to an appeal against the conviction of Chandrabhan Sadavarti, the original appellant, under Section 7 and Section 13(1)(d) read with...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Appeal Against Conviction Under Prevention of Corruption Act. Accused Contends Non-Proof of Bribe Demand and Admission of Loan Repayment by Complainant.

The appeal arose from the judgment and order dated 29.03.2005 in Special Case No.26/2003 passed by the Special Judge at Aurangabad, convicting the app...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Criminal Appeal Against Conviction Under Prevention of Corruption Act. Appeal Pertains to Alleged Bribery Demand by State Excise Superintendent for Renewing Liquor License.

The matter involved a criminal appeal under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, filed by a Superintendent of the State Excise Department at Ratnag...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Provisions. Conviction under Sections 8(c) read with Section 20(C) of NDPS Act, 1985 set aside for failure to comply with Sections 42 and 50.

The appellants, Mangalsingh @ Mangesh Chatursingh Onavale, Ambadas Tukaram Pawar, and Sunil Ranjit Mohite @ Dada, were convicted by the NDPS Special C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Medical Officer in Bribery Case. Acceptance of Rs. 100/- from Complainant Held to be Payment of Outstanding Private Clinic Fees, Not Illegal Gratification Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The case arose from the conviction of a medical officer under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The appellant, Dr. Kiran Anant Deshpande, was a ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal as Abated Due to Death of Appellant in Corruption Case. Appeal Against Conviction Under Prevention of Corruption Act Abates as Sentence of Imprisonment Cannot Be Executed After Death Under Section 394 CrPC.

The appellant, Vijay Parvatrao Salunkhe, a police constable, was convicted by the trial court for offences under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with Sec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal as Abated Due to Death of Appellant in Corruption Case. Appeal Against Conviction Under Prevention of Corruption Act Abates Under Section 394 CrPC as No Legal Heir Can Continue Challenge to Conviction.

The appellant, Vijay Parvatrao Salunkhe, a police constable, was convicted by the trial court for offences under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with Sec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Sections 42 and 50. Conviction under Section 21 of NDPS Act set aside as search and seizure conducted without proper authorization and without informing accused of right to be searched before gazetted officer or magistrate.

The appellant, Suleman Oguk @ Soni, was convicted under Section 21 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) by the Speci...