Search Results for "plausible interpretation"

318 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 318 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award Due to Limitation Bar. Delay of 85 Days in Filing Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act Not Condoned for Lack of Sufficient Cause.

The present appeal was filed under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 read with Section 13(1-A) of the Commercial Courts Act, 20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Share Purchase Agreement Dispute. Court upholds award directing payment of consideration for shares, finding no patent illegality or conflict with public policy under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The Petitioner, Sonoma Management Partners Pvt. Ltd., filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Share Purchase Agreement Dispute. Court upholds award of damages for breach of contract, finding no patent illegality or conflict with public policy under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Sonoma Management Partners Pvt. Ltd., filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeal in Arbitration Dispute Over Construction of World's Highest Railway Bridge. Division Bench's Interference with Concurrent Findings of Arbitral Tribunal and Single Judge Set Aside for Exceeding Section 37 Scope.

The appeal arises from a dispute between Konkan Railway Corporation Limited (appellant) and Chenab Bridge Project Undertaking (respondent) concerning ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Kerala Forest Act Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Statutory Interpretation. Sandalwood Oil Not Classified as Forest Produce Under Section 2(f), and Prosecution Failed to Prove Illicit Removal from Reserve Forest as Required Under Section 27(1)(d).

The appeal arose from a criminal conviction under the Kerala Forest Act, 1961, involving the appellant, a partner in a firm manufacturing and trading ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes High Court Judgment in Tender Dispute, Reinstates Award to Lowest Bidder. The High Court exceeded its jurisdiction by substituting its interpretation of tender conditions for that of the tendering authority, violating principles of judicial review under administrative law.

The dispute arose from a Tender Call Notice dated 30.12.2019 issued by the Office of the Superintendent, SCB Medical College and Hospital, Cuttack, fo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Reservation for In-service Candidates in Postgraduate Medical Courses — State Government's Policy of Granting Weightage to In-service Candidates for 50% of Seats in Government Medical Colleges Held Valid and Not Violative of Article 14 or 16 of the Constitution.

The petitioners, who were candidates for admission to postgraduate medical courses in Maharashtra, challenged the State Government's policy of grantin...