Search Results for "plaintiff's valuation"

408 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 408 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement to Sell Not Proved, Limitation Barred Suit. Plaintiff failed to prove execution of agreement and payment of earnest money; suit filed beyond three years from date of refusal.

The present Regular First Appeal arises from a judgment and decree dated 03.08.2022 passed by the Principal Senior Civil Judge and CJM, Dharwad, in O....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Lessee's Claim for Damages in Wild Life Sanctuary Case — No Right to Compensation Without Acquisition. Notification Under Section 18 of Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 Does Not Confer Right to Damages for Loss of Use.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by M/s Natesan Agencies (Plantations), a partnership firm, against the judgment of the Madras High Court ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Reduces Interest Rate from 12% to 9% in Contractor's Recovery Suit Against State. The court held that interest under Section 34 CPC must be reasonable and not excessive, reducing the rate to 9% per annum.

The dispute arose out of a contract awarded by the State of Goa to P.B. Ibrahim, a Class I PWD Contractor, for improvement of riding quality of NH-4A ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Application to Stay Suit Under Section 10 CPC. Court Held That Section 10 CPC Does Not Apply When Parties Are Not Same in Both Suits and Subject Matter Is Not Directly and Substantially in Issue.

The petitioner, original plaintiff, filed Regular Civil Suit No.19 of 2009 seeking a declaration that a sale deed dated 31/10/2008 was obtained by fra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Property Dispute Over Forged Power of Attorney and Tenancy Documents. The court held that the plaintiff failed to prove forgery of a registered General Power of Attorney and tenancy letter, reversing the trial court's decree for possession.

The case involves a property dispute over Flat No.6 in a building called SUNBEAM. The plaintiff, Rufina M. Pinto, claimed ownership of the entire buil...