Search Results for "pension disbursement"

85 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 85 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs BEST Undertaking to Pay 30% of Retiral Dues to Ex-Employees, Recognizing Their Absolute Entitlement. Non-Payment Due to Financial Constraints of BEST Undertaking and Over-Dependence on MCGM and State Government Held Unacceptable.

This batch of writ petitions was filed by ex-employees of the Brihanmumbai Electricity Supply and Transport Undertaking (BEST) seeking payment of unpa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition for PL Encashment Despite Dismissal — Penalty of Dismissal Does Not Forfeit Privilege Leave Encashment Unless Service Rules Expressly Provide. Leave encashment is a vested right and not forfeited by dismissal in the absence of express rule.

The petitioner, G. Linganagouda, a former Assistant Manager of Pragathi Krishna Gramina Bank (now Karnataka Gramina Bank), was dismissed from service ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation for Death of Businessman in Motor Accident — Negligence of Driver Established, No Contributory Negligence. Claimant Awarded Rs.10,00,600/- with 9% Interest Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case involves two appeals arising from a motor accident claim. The claimant, R.N. Manjula, filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor V...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Union of India's Petition Challenging CAT Direction to Consider Compassionate Appointment for Son of Deceased Railway Employee. CAT Erred in Refusing to Follow Railway Board Circular on Second Marriage as Upheld by Bombay High Court.

The Union of India (Railways) filed a writ petition challenging orders dated 6 March 2014 and 26 August 2014 of the Central Administrative Tribunal (C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Union of India in Section 17A Challenge — Prior Approval Requirement for Investigating Public Servants is Constitutionally Valid. Read Down to Mandate Independent Screening; Lokpal to Approve for Covered Public Servants.

The writ petition was filed by the Centre for Public Interest Litigation challenging the constitutional validity of Section 17A of the Prevention of C...