Search Results for "patent illegality"

1383 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1383 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitration Award in Property Dispute. Court upholds award based on settlement agreement and finds no grounds for interference under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Suratsingh Chaudhary, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an arbitration award...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Challenges to Arbitral Award in Development Agreement Dispute. Court upholds award on termination and damages but modifies interest rate and clarifies that the builder is entitled to retain constructed area as per agreement.

The case involves two arbitration petitions filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging a common arbitral award ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Stock Broker Dispute — No Patent Illegality Found. Claimant's claim for refund of margin money and compensation for unauthorized trades upheld as arbitrator's findings of fact are final under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The judgment concerns two arbitration petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging a common arbitral award da...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Steel Coils Supply Dispute — Non-Conforming Goods Justify Rejection and Damages. The court upheld the arbitral award granting damages for breach of contract where goods did not meet specifications under the contract for sale of goods.

The petitioner, JSW Steel Ltd., challenged an arbitral award dated 28th May 2013 under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Service Agreement Dispute. Court holds that an arbitral award granting refund of mobilization advance and damages for breach of contract does not warrant interference under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Hind Offshore Private Limited, filed a petition under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an order d...