Search Results for "order 7 rule 11"

81 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 81 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in CPC Case — Rejects Application Under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC for Rejection of Plaint as Not Maintainable. Court Holds That Issues of Limitation and Bar of Suit Are Mixed Questions of Fact and Law Requiring Trial, Not Summary Rejection.

The appellant, M/s. Sai Srinivasa Properties and Technologies Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit before the trial court seeking specific performance of an agreem...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Against DRT Order in Debt Recovery Case — Bank Entitled to Recover Debt Under RDB Act. DRT Has Inherent Power to Reject Frivolous Counterclaim Without Recording Evidence, and High Court Should Not Interfere When Alternative Remedy of Appeal Exists.

The case involves two writ petitions arising from proceedings before the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) under the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Fin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Plaint in Summary Suit Withdrawal Case. Order 23 Rule 1 CPC Requires Express Liberty for Fresh Suit, but Withdrawal Order Did Not Bar Fresh Suit as It Was Not a Judgment.

The case involves a Civil Revision Application under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) filed by the applicants (original defendan...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint in Property Dispute — Suit Barred by Limitation Under Order 7 Rule 11(d) CPC. Clause 10 of Agreement for Sale Dated 31-03-1957 Was a Right of Re-Conveyance, Not a Contract for Sale, and Cause of Action Arose in 1988.

The appellant, Kishorbhai Premchand Shah, filed a civil suit in the City Civil Court, Mumbai, seeking a declaration of ownership and permanent injunct...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Dismissal of Suit Against Foreign Sovereign and Union of India for Want of Consent Under Section 86 CPC and Being Time-Barred. Suit Against Sovereign Head of Netherlands Dismissed as Plaint Did Not Disclose Cause of Action and Was Barred by Limitation.

The appellant, K.S. Dhondy, filed a suit in the Bombay High Court for recovery of US $25 million with interest against two respondents: Her Majesty th...