Search Results for "notice under section 148"

1760 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1760 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Against Bank in Income Tax Case for Lack of Fresh Material. Reopening of Assessment Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Held Invalid as Assessing Officer Had Already Considered Exemption Claim During Original Assessment.

The petitioner, State Bank of India, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging a notice dated 30.03.2001 issued...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice and Order in Income Tax Case Due to Lack of Full and True Disclosure Finding and Non-Disposal of Objections. Reopening Beyond Four Years Invalid as No Failure to Disclose Material Facts Alleged Under Section 147 First Proviso of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The petitioner, Crystal Pride Developers, a partnership firm engaged in real estate development, filed its original return of income for Assessment Ye...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice in Income Tax Case for Lack of Fresh Material. Reopening of Assessment Under Section 147 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Invalid When Based on Same Material Already Considered in Original Assessment.

The petitioner, Siemens Financial Services Pvt Ltd, a Non-Banking Finance Company registered with RBI, filed its return of income for Assessment Year ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice under Income Tax Act; Notice Issued Beyond Surviving Time Held Invalid per Rajeev Bansal. The court applied the surviving time principle from Rajeev Bansal and quashed the notice under section 148 and order under section 148A(d) as time-barred.

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the order under section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice in Income Tax Case Due to Change of Opinion. Notice under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for reassessment of derivative transaction loss set aside as Assessing Officer had already examined the issue during original assessment.

The petitioner, Shrikant Phulchand Bhakkad (HUF), through its Karta, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Against Co-operative Bank for Lack of Fresh Material. Notice under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 held invalid as Assessing Officer failed to record any new tangible material after completion of original scrutiny assessment.

The petitioner, Gandhibag Sahakari Bank Limited, a co-operative bank, challenged a notice dated 31.03.2021 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Adjudicates upon Writ Petitions Challenging Re-Assessment Proceedings for Assessment Years 2005-06 to 2007-08. Court Analyzes Whether Notices are Barred by Limitation and Whether Assessee Failed to Disclose Material Facts.

The petitioner, EIT Services India Pvt. Ltd. (formerly Hewlett Packard Globalsoft Private Limited), a company engaged in export of software services a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Quashes Reassessment Notice for Lack of Valid Reason to Believe in Income Tax Case. Failure to Disclose Material Facts Not Established as Petitioner Had Made Full Disclosure Under Income Disclosure Scheme, 2016.

The petitioner, Prabhakar Nerulkar, an individual engaged in real estate business, filed a writ petition challenging a reassessment notice under Secti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Income-Tax Officer's Appeal, Affirming That Notice Under Section 148 of Income-tax Act, 1961 Could Not Be Issued as Right to Reopen Under Section 34 of Income-tax Act, 1922 Was Barred. Section 297(2)(d)(ii) of 1961 Act Does Not Revive Time-Barred Reassessment Powers.

The case involved an income-tax reassessment dispute arising under the Income-tax Act, 1922 and the Income-tax Act, 1961. The respondent, an assessee,...