Search Results for "lapsing"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Issues Notice in Service Matter Challenging Deletion of Names ...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals Against Ex Parte Interim Injunction in Pr...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...

Search Results for "lapsing"

139 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 139 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for De-reservation of Land Under Section 50 of MRTP Act, 1966 — Failure to Acquire Within 10 Years Renders Reservation Lapsed. Land reserved for burial ground not acquired within statutory period; court declares reservation ceased and directs modification of development plan.

25 Nov 2025

The petitioner, Niyojit Siddhivinayak Gruhnirman Sanstha, a housing society through its chairman, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Const...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes High Court Order in Land Acquisition Case Due to Lack of Locus Standi. Subsequent Purchaser Cannot Challenge Acquisition or Its Deemed Lapse Under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 When Original Owners Did Not Contest.

13 Mar 2023

The Supreme Court heard an appeal by the Government of NCT of Delhi against a High Court judgment that had allowed a writ petition declaring land acqu...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Government Appeal in Land Acquisition Case Due to Lack of Locus Standi. High Court's declaration of acquisition lapse under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 is set aside as subsequent purchasers cannot challenge acquisition proceedings.

13 Jan 2023

The Supreme Court of India heard an appeal by the Government of NCT of Delhi against a judgment and order dated 17.07.2017 passed by the High Court of...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows DDA Appeal in Land Acquisition Lapse Case — Subsequent Purchaser Has No Locus to Claim Lapse Under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act. Possession Taken, Compensation Not Paid Does Not Result in Lapse as Twin Conditions Must Be Satisfied.

9 Dec 2022

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) against the judgment of the Delhi High Court, which had declared t...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against High Court's Declaration of Lapsed Acquisition — Subsequent Purchaser Has No Locus to Challenge Acquisition Proceedings Under Section 24(2) of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. Possession Taken in 2007 Precludes Deemed Lapse as Both Possession and Compensation Must Be Unpaid for Five Years.

2 Dec 2022

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the Government of NCT of Delhi and another against the judgment of the Delhi High Court which had declar...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State Appeals in Land Acquisition Lapse Case — Period of Interim Stay Must Be Excluded Under Section 11A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The Court held that the High Court erred in not excluding the period of interim stay while computing the two-year period for declaring the award under Section 11 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, and quashed the High Court's order that had declared the acquisition lapsed.

9 Aug 2019

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by the State of Maharashtra against the judgment of the Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) which had qua...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Land Reservations in Development Plan Under MRTP Act. Reservations for MSEB Extension and School/Playground Quashed as Not Acquired Within 10 Years, Land Deemed De-reserved.

6 Oct 2014

The petitioner, Vikramsinh Jaysingrao Ghatge, owned land bearing R.S.No.247/2/1 admeasuring 3 hectares at Kagal, District Kolhapur. The Government of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Against Re-inclusion of Property in Development Plan After Reservation Lapsed Under Section 127 of MRTP Act. Municipal Corporation cannot re-reserve same property after statutory lapse of reservation.

29 Sep 2014

The petitioner, M/s. Motiwala Land Agencies, owned a piece of land in Aurangabad which was reserved for a public purpose (garden) in the Development P...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Landowners' Petition for Deemed Lapse of Reservation Under MRTP Act — Failure to Acquire Within Twelve Months of Notice Under Section 127 Results in Reservation Lapsing and Land Becoming Available for Development. The court held that the mere passing of a resolution or delegation of powers does not constitute taking steps for acquisition; actual steps such as issuance of notification under Section 126(4) are required.

30 Apr 2014

The petitioners, Mohammed Shaffi Usmansaheb Kokani and others, owned land in Nashik that was reserved for a garden under Reservation No.358C in the De...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for De-reservation of Land Under Section 127 of MRTP Act, 1966 Due to Non-Acquisition Within 10 Years and Failure to Act on Purchase Notice. The court held that the reservation for playground and recreational activities lapsed as the Planning Authority failed to acquire the land within six months of the purchase notice under Section 127 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

18 Dec 2006

The petitioners, owners of four plots of land at Rajapeth, Amravati, filed a writ petition seeking a declaration that the reservation of their lands f...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)