Encroachment on B-Kharab Land: Key Judgment Every Property Owner Must Know.
6 Feb 2026The writ petitions were filed challenging action of BBMP alleging construction over a storm water drain and seeking protection from demolition –...
Search Results for "land encroachment"
574 result(s) found
Found 574 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Demolition Notice Against Developer in BBMP Dispute — Notice Issued Without Proper Hearing Violates Natural Justice. Court holds that Section 321 of the Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976 requires a show-cause notice and opportunity of hearing before ordering demolition of alleged unauthorized construction.
1 Dec 2023The petitioner, Emerald Haven Development Ltd, a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of...
- 118
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Land Encroachment Case, Upholding Demolition and Possession Decree. Concurrent findings of ownership and encroachment were not interfered with under Article 136 of the Constitution, and Section 51 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 was held inapplicable as the appellant failed to establish being a transferee with bona fide belief.
2 Feb 2023The dispute originated from a civil suit filed by the respondent (plaintiff) for possession of land measuring 11 Biswancies and demolition of structur...
- 480
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Remands Land Encroachment Case to High Court for Failure to Address Substantial Question of Law. High Court formulated question regarding sustainability of concurrent findings after surveyor's report but dismissed second appeal without deciding it, necessitating remand for proper adjudication under Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
21 Sep 2021The dispute originated from a civil suit filed by the appellant (plaintiff) alleging encroachment by two defendants on land purchased in 1995. The pla...
- 215
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Land Encroachment Suit — Remands for Fresh Consideration of Measurement Evidence. Court holds that the lower appellate court failed to consider the TILR's map and report, which constituted a substantial question of law under Section 100 CPC.
8 Nov 2019The present second appeal arises from a suit for possession of encroached land. The appellants, original plaintiffs, are members of a joint family own...
- 161
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Encroachment and Possession Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed Under Section 100 CPC. Defendants' Encroachment on Plaintiffs' Land Upheld Based on Measurement and Revenue Records.
22 Jul 2019The present second appeal was filed by the original defendants challenging the concurrent findings and decree in R.C.A. No.65/2015 by the learned Dist...
- 86
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Transfer Order in Land Grabbing Case — Civil Court Retains Jurisdiction Over Title Suit. Section 20 of Karnataka Land Grabbing Prohibition Act, 2011 Does Not Mandate Transfer of Suit Where No Land Grabbing Allegation is Made by Government.
14 Mar 2019The petitioner, Joseph Saldhana, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 30.10.2018 passed by the 1st Additional Civil Judge, Mangaluru, in ...
- 68
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in Encroachment Dispute — Interim Injunction Granted to Maintain Status Quo Pending Appointment of Court Commissioner. Court holds that in a suit for removal of encroachment, the court must appoint a Commissioner to ascertain the factual position at site before refusing interim relief, and the pendency of such application cannot be ignored.
18 Dec 2017The petitioner, Bholaprasad Foudar Bharti, filed a civil suit (Regular Civil Suit No.438 of 2017) before the 3rd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division, K...
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Disqualification of Sarpanch for Son's Encroachment on Government Land. The term 'person' under Section 14(1)(j3) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958 includes legal representatives of the encroacher.
21 Sep 2017The petitioner, Sau. Anita Laxman Junghare, was the Sarpanch and a member of Gram Panchayat, Nagapura. Respondent Nos. 3 and 4 filed a complaint alleg...
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appellant's Second Appeals in Property Dispute Cases Due to Lack of Substantial Question of Law. Concurrent findings of fact by lower courts on encroachment and possession were upheld as not perverse under Section 100 of CPC, 1908.
5 Oct 2012The judgment pertains to two second appeals filed by the same appellant, Pandurang Dharma Gaikwad, against the respondent, Mahamudmuya Ahmadsaheb Pati...
- 10
