Search Results for "immoral traffic prevention"

131 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 131 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Strikes Down Caste-Based Discrimination in Prison Manuals as Unconstitutional. Prison Rules Dividing Labour and Segregating Barracks by Caste Violate Articles 14, 15, 17, 21, and 23 of the Constitution.

The petitioner, Sukanya Shantha, a journalist, filed a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution seeking directions for the repeal of offendi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Grants Bail to Accused in Rape and Trafficking Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence and Long Incarceration. Petitioner Granted Bail Under Section 439 CrPC for Offences Under Sections 342, 370, 376 IPC and Immoral Traffic Prevention Act.

The petitioner, Pawan Kumar, filed a criminal petition under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking bail in Crime No.14/2020 reg...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Prostitution Case Due to Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 363, 366A IPC and Section 5 of Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act set aside as sole testimony of victim was uncorroborated and unreliable.

The appellant, Mrs. Amina @ Saniya M. Shakil Shaikh, was convicted by the Assistant Sessions Judge, Solapur, for offences under Sections 363, 366A rea...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal in Gang Rape Acquittal — Trial Court's Finding of Inconsistent Child Testimony and Lack of Corroboration Upheld. Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Section 376(2)(g) IPC and Section 5 of Prevention of Immoral Traffic Act.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order dated 28 January 2011 passed by the Sessions Court at Dindoshi, Mumbai in Sessions Ca...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Sealing Order Under Section 18 of Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 — Petitioner Failed to Show Prejudice from Procedural Irregularities. Typographical Error in Designation of Authority Does Not Vitiate Order When Power Was Validly Conferred.

The petitioner, Smt. Sharada Premlal Chhadi, aged 65 years, was the occupier of House No.6, City Survey No.175/528, Nagpur. She was allegedly running ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Detention Under MPDA Act — Preventive Detention Upheld as Legally Valid. Court holds that subjective satisfaction of detaining authority based on credible material is sufficient and not vitiated by delay in disposal of representation.

The case involves a criminal writ petition filed by 23 petitioners challenging their detention under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activitie...