High Court of Karnataka Quashes Proceedings Against Accused No.8 in Immoral Traffic Prevention Act Case Due to Lack of Incriminating Material. Petitioner's name not found in any incriminating material or charge sheet, and no specific overt act attributed, leading to quashing of proceedings under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Accused
  • 126
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Mrs. Swathi, accused No.8 in C.C.No.1397/2013, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) seeking quashing of proceedings pending before the Additional Civil Judge and JMFC, Kundapura. The proceedings arose from Crime No.16/2013 registered under Section 5 of the Immoral Traffic Prevention Act, 1956. The background of the case involves a complaint that on 13.01.2013, the Police Sub-Inspector of Kundapura Police Station, while investigating Crime No.13/2013, received information that some girls were being illegally transported from Udupi to Goa in a tempo traveler bearing registration No.KA 21 A 2088 for prostitution. The vehicle was intercepted on National Highway 66. The petitioner was arrayed as accused No.8. The court heard arguments from Sri Kumara, counsel for the petitioner, and Sri B.N. Jagadeesh, Additional State Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1. The court examined the records and found that the petitioner's name was not found in any incriminating material or the charge sheet, and no specific overt act was attributed to her. The court held that continuing the proceedings against the petitioner would be an abuse of the process of law. Consequently, the court allowed the petition and quashed the proceedings against the petitioner in C.C.No.1397/2013.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure Code - Quashing of Proceedings - Section 482 Cr.P.C. - Lack of Incriminating Material - Petitioner/accused No.8 sought quashing of proceedings under Section 5 of the Immoral Traffic Prevention Act, 1956 - Court found that petitioner's name was not found in any incriminating material or charge sheet, and no specific overt act was attributed - Held that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of process of law, and proceedings were quashed (Paras 1-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the proceedings against the petitioner/accused No.8 in C.C.No.1397/2013 for offence under Section 5 of the Immoral Traffic Prevention Act, 1956 should be quashed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. when the petitioner's name is not found in any incriminating material or charge sheet and no specific overt act is attributed.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is allowed. The proceedings in C.C.No.1397/2013 pending before the Additional Civil Judge and JMFC, Kundapura, against the petitioner/accused No.8 are quashed.

Law Points

  • Quashing of criminal proceedings under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
  • Lack of incriminating material against accused
  • No specific overt act attributed
  • Immoral Traffic Prevention Act
  • 1956 Section 5
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2024 LawText (KAR) (06) 57

CRL.P No. 807 of 2024

2024-06-10

M. Nagaprasanna

NC: 2024:KHC:20458

Sri Kumara, Sri B.N. Jagadeesh

Mrs. Swathi

The State of Karnataka, Smt. Revathi

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of proceedings in C.C.No.1397/2013 for offence under Section 5 of the Immoral Traffic Prevention Act, 1956.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner/accused No.8 sought quashing of proceedings and orders of cognizance taken on 13.06.2013.

Filing Reason

Petitioner's name not found in any incriminating material or charge sheet, and no specific overt act attributed.

Issues

Whether the proceedings against the petitioner should be quashed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. due to lack of incriminating material and no specific overt act attributed.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that her name was not found in any incriminating material or charge sheet, and no specific overt act was attributed to her. Respondent State opposed the petition.

Ratio Decidendi

Where the name of the accused is not found in any incriminating material or charge sheet and no specific overt act is attributed, continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of process of law, warranting quashing under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioner/accused No.8 is before this Court calling in question proceedings in C.C.No.1397/2013 pending before the Additional Civil Judge and JMFC, Kundapura arising out of crime in Crime No.16/2013 registered for offence punishable under Section 5 of the Immoral Traffic Prevention Act, 1956. The court found that the petitioner's name was not found in any incriminating material or the charge sheet, and no specific overt act was attributed to her.

Procedural History

Crime No.16/2013 was registered on 13.01.2013 under Section 5 of the Immoral Traffic Prevention Act, 1956. The petitioner was arrayed as accused No.8. The case was taken cognizance on 13.06.2013 and numbered as C.C.No.1397/2013 before the Additional Civil Judge and JMFC, Kundapura. The petitioner filed CRL.P No. 807 of 2024 under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of the proceedings. The High Court allowed the petition on 10.06.2024.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 482
  • Immoral Traffic Prevention Act, 1956: 5
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Defendant in Lease Dispute Over Strip of Land and Easement Rights. Lease Deed Lacking Heritability Clause Held Not Permanent, and Claim of Easement by Prescription Failed Due to Absence of Hostile Claim and Substantial Deprivati...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Revenue Appeal, Holds Interest on Unrecognised Provident Fund Contributions Taxable Under Section 56 of Income-tax Act, 1961. High Court's Exemption under Section 17(3)(ii) Set Aside as Interest on Assessee's Own Contributions Co...