Search Results for "final scheme"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "final scheme"

5772 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5772 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Restrains Developers from Constructing Additional Buildings in Multi-Building Scheme Without Flat Owners' Consent Under MOFA. Disclosure of Potential Additional Construction Held Insufficient Where Specific Representations Were Made About FSI Utilisation and Layout.

22 Jan 2015

The dispute centered on a 230-acre development known as the Powai Area Development Scheme (PADS), in which several cooperative housing societies of co...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Directs Winding Up of Mutual Fund Schemes and Interprets SEBI Regulations. The Court examined the interrelation and constitutional validity of Regulations 39 to 42 with Regulation 18(15)(c) of the SEBI (Mutual Funds) Regulations, 1996, while deferring final adjudication pending statutory proceedings under the SEBI Act, 1992.

14 Jul 2021

The Supreme Court of India addressed civil appeals concerning the interpretation and application of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Mutual...

High Court

Bombay High Court Issues Rule in Writ Petition Challenging Orders Restricting Redevelopment of Cooperative Society under PWR-219 Scheme. Court frames issues regarding requirement of prior permission from Social Welfare Department for redevelopment using additional FSI/TDR.

8 Dec 2016

The writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was filed by a co-operative housing society challenging orders dated 8 June 2016 and ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Challenging Eviction Order Under Section 95A of Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976 in Cooperative Society Redevelopment Scheme. Petitioners, Tenement Owners, Opposed Redevelopment by Developer Appointed by Majority of Society Members and Sought Quashing of Eviction Order and Declaration that Scheme Is Illegal.

24 Apr 2012

The petitioners, eight members and owners of tenements in Chitranjan Nagar Vidya Cooperative Housing Society Limited, Rajawadi, Ghatkopar (East), Mumb...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Liability for Supplementary Award Rests with Original Beneficiary, Not Transferee Company. Scheme of Arrangement Under Sections 391-394 of Companies Act, 1956 Does Not Transfer Contingent Liabilities of Pending Acquisition Proceedings.

20 Sep 2024

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by M/s Ultra-Tech Cement Ltd. against the order of the Himachal Pradesh High Court dated 12.07.2022. The Hi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Subsidy Claim Under Goa State Investment Scheme, 1990 — Rejection Based on Grouping of Units and Product Identity Set Aside. Court holds that the State Level Committee's decision to treat two separate companies as a single unit for subsidy calculation was arbitrary and contrary to the Scheme's provisions.

17 Sep 2019

The petitioner, Fabrica de Gas Carbonico Pvt. Ltd., a small scale industry engaged in manufacturing industrial gases, applied for subsidy under the Go...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Passes Order in Writ Petition by Company Challenging Rejection of Application Under Industrial Park Scheme, 2002. Petitioner's Application Dated 15.12.2006 Under IPS 2002 Was Rejected on Ground That Scheme Expired on 31.03.2006.

17 Sep 2024

The petitioner, a private limited company, proposed to set up an industrial park named 'Salarpuria Touch Stone' in Bangalore under a Joint Development...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Considers Legality of Rejection of Declaration Under Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019. Petitioner Challenged Ineligibility Determination Based on Date of Final Hearing Under Section 125(1)(c) of Finance (No.2) Act, 2019, Arguing That No Appeal Had Been Filed Against the Order‑in‑Original.

26 Nov 2020

The petitioners, a partnership firm engaged in Haj and Umrah tours, challenged the rejection of their declaration under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Disp...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Validity of Premium Floor Area Ratio Scheme and Rejects Challenges Under Articles 14, 21, 243ZE, and 300A of Constitution. Section 18-B of Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961 and Section 38-D of Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 Held Not Violative of Constitution, and All Impugned Notifications Sustained.

15 Jun 2026

The matter concerns a batch of cases challenging the constitutional validity of statutory provisions introducing the Premium Floor Area Ratio (FAR) sc...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Condition Imposing 90% Backward Class Membership in Redevelopment of PWR 219 Scheme Land — Condition Held Unreasonable and Without Legal Basis Under Article 226. The court struck down the condition as violative of Article 14 of the Constitution, finding it arbitrary and lacking statutory foundation, thereby allowing redevelopment without membership composition restrictions.

25 Aug 2021

The petitioners, members of Sangam Cooperative Housing Society Ltd., challenged a condition imposed by the Social Justice and Special Assistance Depar...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)