Search Results for "evidence insufficiency"

286 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 286 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Food Inspector Challenging Minor Penalty Without Hearing. Withholding of Increment Without Cumulative Effect Quashed for Violation of Principles of Natural Justice Under Article 311(2) of the Constitution.

The petitioner, Shri Manik Abaso Jadhav, was appointed as a Food Inspector with the Mira Bhayandar Municipal Corporation. Subsequently, the designatio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Dishonour of Cheque Cases Due to Lack of Proper Service of Notice Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 — Complainant Failed to Prove Service of Demand Notice as Required by Section 138(b) of the Act.

The petitioner, M/s Soft-touch Computer through its proprietor Shashikant Bhaskar Zope, filed three criminal writ petitions under Section 482 of the C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Impounding of Photocopy of Tenancy Agreement for Collateral Purpose. Photocopy of Unstamped Agreement Cannot Be Impounded Under Section 34 of Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958.

The case involves two writ petitions arising from a civil suit for eviction filed by the original plaintiff (Dr. Smt. Seema Arun Mankar) against the o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case — Presumption Under Section 139 N.I. Act Not Rebutted by Accused. Borrowing of Rs.20,000/- and Issuance of Cheque Established; Acquittal Set Aside.

The appeal arises out of the judgment of acquittal passed by the learned Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Sagar dated 26.08.2011 in C.C.No.124/2010 wherei...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Restores Conviction in Cheque Dishonour Case: High Court Erred in Reappreciating Evidence Beyond Revisional Jurisdiction. Presumption under Sections 118 and 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 stands unless rebutted by accused with probable defence.

The appellant-complainant alleged that he advanced a loan of Rs.22,00,000 to the respondent-accused, who issued a cheque dated 17.03.2010 for the same...