Search Results for "doubtful recovery"

1143 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1143 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Criminal Appeals in Murder Case Under Section 302 IPC, Examining Circumstantial Evidence and Procedural Irregularities. Appellants Challenge Reliability of Recovery and Chain of Custody, Arguing Investigation Delays Vitiate Conviction.

The case arose from a violent incident on 19.1.2011 in Timki Mochipura, Nagpur, where Dinesh Shendekar was killed and his brother Deva and another per...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Interested Witnesses and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 302 and 324 read with 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, Satish Bansi Lagad, Bansi Kisan Lagad, Kisan Ganpat Lagad, and Aashabai Bansi Lagad, were convicted by the Sessions Judge, Ahmednagar ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Bank's Appeal Against High Court's Mandamus to Consider OTS Application. Court Holds That No Writ of Mandamus Can Be Issued to Direct a Bank to Grant One Time Settlement Benefit Under Article 226 of the Constitution.

The present appeal arises from a judgment of the Allahabad High Court which, in exercise of powers under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, iss...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Life Imprisonment for Appellant in Murder and Robbery Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Recovery of Stolen Property and Weapon from Accused, Coupled with Conspiracy Evidence, Completed Chain of Circumstances.

The appellant, Sonu @ Sunil, along with four others, was tried for the murder of Bharosilal and robbery of gold and silver jewellery and two mobile ph...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case pertains to the murder of Uttam Narnaware, for which the appellants, Sheikh Ahmed Munshi Sheikh (accused No.2) and Suman @ Sushila Radhelal @...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging SARFAESI Proceedings Against Partnership Firm and Guarantors. SARFAESI Act Section 13(2) Notice Validly Issued Against Principal Borrower and Guarantors, and Section 17 Application Before DRT Is the Appropriate Remedy.

The petitioners, M/s. Otoklin Global Business (a partnership firm) and its partner Mr. Dhaval Dilip Jhaveri, filed a writ petition under Article 226 o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Dacoity Case Due to Lack of Identification and Recovery. Conviction under Sections 395, 397, 457 IPC Set Aside as Test Identification Parade Was Not Conducted and Evidence of Witnesses Was Inconsistent.

The case arises from a dacoity incident that occurred on the night of 20-21 March 1999 at a petrol pump in Dalimb village, Osmanabad. The owner Birajd...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Shivaji @Shiva Shrimant Sonawane, was convicted by the 1st Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Kolhapur, in Sessions Case No. 440 of 2001 ...