Search Results for "detenue statement"

137 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 137 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Act for Non-Application of Mind and Mechanical Exercise of Power. Detenu's Right to Make Representation Under Article 22(5) of Constitution Was Frustrated by Delayed Consideration and Failure to Supply Relevant Documents.

The petitioner, a friend of the detenu Mavin Keezhil Mohamed Aslam, filed a writ of habeas corpus under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes MPDA Detention Order for Non-Communication of Documents — Violation of Section 8 MPDA Act. Preventive Detention Order Set Aside as Detenu Was Not Supplied Copies of In-Camera Statements and Bail Order, Depriving Him of Right to Make Effective Representation.

The petitioner, Omkar Chandrashekhar Kapare, challenged his preventive detention under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition and Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind. Detenu in Judicial Custody Without Bail Application — Detaining Authority Failed to Disclose Compelling Reasons for Detention.

The petitioner, Pravin @ Purshottam Shrinivas Mahajan, challenged an order of preventive detention dated 29 April 2014 passed by the Commissioner of P...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Bail Application of Accused in NDPS Case on Grounds of Illegal Detention. Question Whether Production on Transfer Warrant Satisfies Requirement of Production Within 24 Hours Under Article 22(2) and Section 57 CrPC Raised.

The matter arose from a bail application filed by the accused in an NDPS case. The accused was charged under Section 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psyc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Subjective Satisfaction and Non-Consideration of Bail Orders. Detaining Authority's Failure to Interact with Witnesses and Consider Bail Orders Renders Detention Invalid.

The petitioner, Suraj @ Lalla Kalicharan Thakur, through his father, challenged the legality of a detention order dated 20/10/2022 passed by the Distr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind — Detenu in Judicial Custody Without Bail Application. Failure to Disclose Compelling Reasons for Detention Despite Awareness of Custody Renders Order Invalid Under Section 3(1) of MPDA Act, 1981.

The petitioner, Pravin @ Purshottam Shrinivas Mahajan, challenged an order of preventive detention dated 29 April 2014 passed by the Commissioner of P...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Unexplained Delay and Lack of Public Order Element. Single Crime and In-Camera Statements Insufficient to Justify Preventive Detention Under Section 3(1) of Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981.

The petitioner, Umesh Shivaji Vetal, challenged an order of detention dated 09.06.2025 passed by the District Magistrate, Ahilyanagar, under Section 3...