Search Results for "consumer complaint"

719 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 719 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Allows Appeal in Insurance Claim Case — State Commission Failed to Consider Compensation Amount. Compensation of Rs. 3,000 per day from 15.06.2021 till payment was not considered by State Commission in Appeal No. 129 of 2023.

The case involves an appeal by Manoj Kumar against TATA AIG General Insurance Company Ltd. and three others. The dispute arose from a complaint filed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Special Leave Petition in Consumer Complaint Against Advocates for Lack of Merit and Delay. Advocates Not Liable for Deficiency in Service When Case Lost on Merits Without Evidence of Negligence Under Consumer Protection Act.

The dispute originated from consumer complaints filed by the petitioner against BSNL before the District Consumer Forum, which were dismissed on merit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Allows Second Appeal Subject to Cost in Consumer Complaint Restoration Case — Delay Condoned and Complaint Restored on Payment of Rs. 10,000. Consumer Protection Act, 2019 — Condonation of delay and restoration of complaint dismissed for non-prosecution.

The case involves a second appeal before the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) against an order of the State Consumer Disputes R...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeal in Consumer Complaint, Reducing Compensation for Deficiency in Hair Styling Services. Deficiency in Service Upheld as Factual Finding, but Compensation of Rs.2 Crores Set Aside as Excessive and Unsupported by Evidence Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

The appeal arose from an order of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) in a consumer complaint filed by the respondent against ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Upholds Electricity Ombudsman's Order Allowing Refund of Excess Tariff Charged to Industrial Consumer. Limitation Period Under MERC Regulations Not Applicable to Continuing Wrong of Wrongful Billing at Commercial Tariff Instead of Industrial Tariff.

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL), challenged the order dated 22/01/2016 passed by the Electricity O...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Dismisses Builder’s Writ Petition Challenging NCDRC’s Rejection of Condonation of 1132-Day Delay; No Perversity Found. Delay in Appeal Against State Commission Order Not Sufficiently Explained Under Section 23 of Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

The petitioners, a construction firm and its partners, launched a real estate project and received an investment of Rs. 6,50,000/- from the respondent...