Search Results for "complaint maintainability"

613 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 613 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Vehicle Theft Insurance Claim — Negligence Not a Valid Ground for Repudiation. Theft of vehicle due to driver leaving keys in ignition does not amount to breach of policy conditions; insurer directed to pay 75% of sum assured on non-standard basis.

The appellant, Ashok Kumar, was the owner of a truck (dumper) bearing registration No. HR-55C-5385, insured with New India Assurance Co. Ltd. for an I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Condominium Association for Lack of Locus Standi Under Consumer Protection Act. Statutory Body Formed Under Karnataka Apartment Ownership Act, 1972 Is Not a Voluntary Consumer Association or Consumer Under Section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

The appellant, Sobha Hibiscus Condominium, is a statutory body formed under the Karnataka Apartment Ownership Act, 1972, comprising owners of apartmen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Labour Court Order Setting Aside Retrenchment as Unfair Labour Practice. Employer Failed to Prove Genuine Closure, Retrenchment of 23 Workmen Without Complying with Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Held Illegal.

The petitioner, M/s. Sanket Food Products Pvt. Ltd., challenged the judgments of the Labour Court and Industrial Court which held that the retrenchmen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Against Politician for Alleged Disproportionate Assets — No Prima Facie Case Made Out. Petitioner failed to provide credible material to justify investigation under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The petitioner, an RTI activist, filed a PIL in the Bombay High Court alleging that respondent 9, a politician and former Home Minister of Maharashtra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Summons in Cheating Case for Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction and Non-Disclosure of Offence. The court held that the Magistrate at Indore had no jurisdiction as no cause of action arose there, and the complaint did not disclose any offence under Sections 420 or 406 IPC.

The petitioners challenged the summons issued by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate at Indore under Sections 420 or 406 read with Section 120-B ...