Search Results for "cadre distinction"

152 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 152 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals of Para-Teachers Seeking Regularisation in Jharkhand. Contractual Engagement Under Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan Does Not Confer Right to Absorption or Pay Parity with Regular Teachers.

The Supreme Court dismissed a batch of civil appeals filed by para-teachers engaged under the Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan (SSA) in Jharkhand, challenging th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Division Bench Order in AIADMK Internal Dispute — Interim Injunction Denied for Party Meetings. Court holds that temporary injunction in political party affairs requires strict compliance with CPC principles and balance of convenience.

The Supreme Court disposed of a batch of appeals arising from interim orders in civil suits concerning the internal management of the All India Anna D...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Assistant Professors' Promotion Under DACP Scheme Against Statutory Corporation's Recruitment Regulations. Promotion Governed by DACP Scheme as ESIC Regulations Issued Without Prior Central Government Approval Under Section 17(2)(a) of Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948.

The dispute arose from the promotion of Assistant Professors employed by the Employees' State Insurance Corporation (ESIC) to the post of Associate Pr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Library Assistants Seeking Promotion to Assistant University Librarian. Post of Assistant University Librarian is a Teaching Post Under Section 2(34) of Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994, and Petitioners Being Non-Teaching Staff Are Not Entitled to Promotion.

The petitioners, four Library Assistants employed by Nagpur University, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challengi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Government Engineer Seeking Antedated Promotion. Petitioner's claim for regular promotion from 2004 rejected as ad-hoc promotion in 2005 did not confer right to retrospective regularisation.

The petitioner, Shri S. Lekshmanan, was appointed as Junior Engineer (Electrical) on 04.06.1979 and promoted to Assistant Engineer on 15.07.1996. He c...