Search Results for "bona fide delay"

1243 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1243 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside Condonation of 1011 Days Delay in Filing Second Appeal — Gross Negligence and Lack of Sufficient Cause. Limitation Act Section 5 Requires Sufficient Cause for Entire Period of Delay; Unexplained Delay Cannot Be Condoned.

The appellant, original plaintiff, filed a civil suit for permanent injunction which was dismissed by the Trial Court on 23.04.2016. The First Appella...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Chamber Summons to Set Aside Abatement of Arbitration Petition and Condonation of Delay. Application Filed Under Order 22 Rule 9 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 to Bring Legal Representatives of Deceased Parties on Record.

The Chamber Summons was filed under Order 22 Rule 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking to set aside the abatement of Arbitration Petition N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Dismisses Second Appeal Due to Unexplained Delay of 169 Days. Bureaucratic Delays Not Sufficient Cause for Condonation of Delay Under Section 24A of Consumer Protection Act, 2019.

The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dismissed a second appeal filed by the Sub Post Master, Gandhinagar, against Meenaben Bhaw...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Industrial Court Rejection of Condonation of Delay in Unfair Labour Practice Complaint. Employee's Delay of Six Years Four Months Held Sufficiently Explained by Bona Fide Civil Court Proceedings Under MRTU and PULP Act, 1971.

The petitioner, a former Branch Manager of a cooperative bank, was dismissed from service on 2 March 2012 on the ground of consuming alcohol while on ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Union of India's Appeal Against Refusal to Condon 12-Year Delay in Restoration Application. Limitation Rules Apply Equally to Government; No Sufficient Cause Shown for Inordinate Delay.

The dispute originated from a lease deed executed in 1951 for a bungalow in Pune Cantonment. The respondent (landlord) filed a civil suit in 1981 for ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding Up Petition for Lack of Bona Fides and Substantial Defence. Company's claim of disputed debt and pending civil suit found to be a bona fide defence against winding up under Sections 433 and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956.

The petitioner, M/s. Joshi Bullion Gems & Jewellery Pvt. Ltd., filed a winding up petition under Sections 433 and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956 again...