Search Results for "bank guarantee exemption"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "bank guarantee exemption"

208 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 208 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case on Interest Income Classification. Interest income from bank deposits, intercorporate deposits, call money, debentures, and from Income Tax Department held not to be business income for deduction under Section 80HHC of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

30 Sep 2014

The Revenue Department filed appeals under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the orders of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) fo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Clause 11(5) of GR Dated 5 March 2011 Requiring Two Public Advertisements Before Extension of Age of Superannuation for Principals in Non-Government Institutions. Condition is Valid and Non-Discriminatory After Corrigendum Dated 9 May 2014 Made It Uniformly Applicable to Government Institutions.

19 Jan 2016

The Bombay High Court disposed of a batch of writ petitions involving a challenge to clause 11(5) of the Government Resolution dated 5 March 2011, whi...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Cooperative Bank CEO Appointment Dispute — Upholds Apex Society's Power to Depute Cadre Officers. Section 54(3) of Chhattisgarh Co-Operative Societies Act, 1960 obligates District Central Cooperative Bank to accept CEO deputed by State Cooperative Bank from its cadre.

4 Mar 2020

The dispute arose from the appointment of the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of the first respondent, Zila Sahkari Kendriya Bank Maryadit, a District C...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Process Against Directors in Cheque Dishonour Case — Lack of Specific Allegations of Role in Day-to-Day Affairs. Directors Cannot Be Vicariously Liable Under Section 141 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Without Averments of Their Involvement in Company's Business.

5 Sep 2014

The petitioners, including a company and its directors, challenged the order issuing process under Section 138 read with Section 141 of the Negotiable...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Reserves Judgment on Challenge to Fringe Benefit Tax Provisions. Petitions question constitutional validity of Chapter XII-H of Income Tax Act, 1961 as violative of Article 14 and beyond legislative competence.

6 Dec 2019

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard three writ petitions filed by M/s T.T.K. Prestige Ltd. and another, M/s N. Rangarao & Sons, and Karnata...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Settlement Commission in Customs Duty Case — Petitioner's Full Disclosure and Cooperation Justifies Settlement. Settlement Commission's Rejection of Application for Non-Disclosure of Additional Amounts Set Aside as Unreasonable Under Section 127B of Customs Act, 1962.

15 Sep 2022

The petitioner, Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd., is engaged in the manufacture of vehicles in India. It filed four applications before the Settlement Commiss...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Customs Duty Demand on Jewellery Exports from SEZ — Held that goods manufactured in SEZ and exported are not liable to customs duty under Section 2(23) of the Customs Act, 1962 read with SEZ Act, 2005. The court ruled that the SEZ Act, 2005 is a complete code and overrides the Customs Act, and the demand of duty was contrary to the scheme of the SEZ Act.

19 Nov 2022

The petitioners, M/s. Renaissance Global Limited and M/s. Gold Star Jewellery Designs Pvt. Ltd., are companies engaged in the manufacture and export o...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Partly Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim; Holds Insurer Liable to Pay and Recover for Violation of Policy Condition Regarding Hazardous Goods Endorsement. The Court Reassessed Compensation Applying the Principle of Pay and Recover and Enhanced Amounts Under Loss of Dependency and Conventional Heads.

16 Jun 2020

The appeal arose from a motor accident claim filed by the widow, parents, and minor daughter of the deceased B.S. Thippeswamy. On 2 July 2012, the dec...

High Court

GST on Advances for Future Supplies: Examining Constitutional Validity. Evaluating GST's application to unutilized advances and its constitutionality.

14 Nov 2024

The L&T IHI Consortium, a collaboration between Larsen & Toubro Ltd. (L&T) and IHI Infrastructure Systems Co. Ltd., Japan, challenged the ...

High Court

Madras High Court Examines Whether Settlement Commission Erred in Not Considering Export Performance During Extended Period in EPCG Duty Case. Appellant Sought Recalculation of Customs Duty Based on 30% Export Obligation Achieved, Arguing That One-Year Extension Was Not Properly Accounted.

19 Feb 2025

The appellant, M/s. Asianet Satellite Communication Limited, a service provider in television network, imported cable TV equipment valued at Rs.6,14,3...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)