Search Results for "article 31(2)"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "article 31(2)"

241 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 241 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Hears Appeals Filed by Convicts in Akshardham Temple Terror Attack Case. Appeals Challenge Convictions Under POTA, IPC, Arms Act, and Explosive Substances Act for Conspiracy and Murder of 33 Persons.

1 Aug 2026

The Supreme Court of India heard criminal appeals filed by the convicted accused-appellants challenging their conviction and sentences awarded by the ...

High Court

High Court Quashes FIR Against School Principal in National Flag Insult Case Due to Lack of Intent and Control Over Circulated Image. Offence Under Section 2 of Prevention of Insult to National Honors Act, 1971 Not Made Out as Petitioner Had No Knowledge or Intention to Disrespect Flag, and Image Was Allegedly Edited by Students.

21 Feb 2026

The dispute arose from an FIR registered against the petitioner, a school principal, under Section 2 of the Prevention of Insult to National Honors Ac...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in Extortion Case Due to Long Incarceration and Snail-Paced Trial. Delay in FIR and Lack of Evidence Weaken Prosecution Case Under Sections 364-A, 384, 385, 386, 387 IPC and Sections 3, 25 Arms Act.

7 Feb 2025

The applicant, Mohammad Khalid Mukhtar Ahmed Shaikh, was accused No.1 in C.R. No.312 of 2020 registered with Bhiwandi City Police Station for offences...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Case by Restoring Arbitral Award. High Court's Setting Aside of Award Under Section 37(1)(c) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Found Erroneous as It Exceeded Scope of Judicial Review.

28 Jul 2021

The Supreme Court of India heard a civil appeal arising from a dispute between PSA Sical Terminals Pvt. Ltd., the appellant, and The Board of Trustees...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal and Condoned Delay in Filing First Appeal Due to Bureaucratic Delay and Strategic Importance of Land. The Court held that the High Court should have considered the impersonal nature of government functioning and condoned the delay to avoid injustice to the State's interest.

22 Oct 2019

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the State of Manipur and others against the judgment of the High Court of Manipur, which had refused to ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Mandamus Directing Finalization of RPF as Organized Service. In-Principle Approval by DoPT Was Conditional and Subject to Cadre Review Committee Approval, Which Was Not Granted.

1 Feb 2019

The Supreme Court disposed of a batch of appeals filed by the Union of India against judgments of the Delhi High Court that had directed the governmen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Pensioner's Writ Petition for Fixation of Pay Scale and Pensionary Benefits in Education Service — Held that Petitioner is Entitled to Pay Scale of Trained Graduate Teacher and Pensionary Benefits from Date of Initial Appointment.

13 Feb 2018

The petitioner, Walmik Sitaram Sirsath, was appointed as an Assistant Teacher in the Government D.Ed. College, Neknoor, on 1.12.1984. He possessed a B...

High Court

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Administrative Tribunal's Order — Petitioner Lacks Locus Standi as Non-Party. The court held that a person not a party to proceedings before an administrative tribunal cannot challenge its order without showing direct and substantial affectation of rights.

15 Sep 2010

The petitioner, Shri Ranjit Satardekar, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Bombay at Goa, c...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Tax on Medical Reimbursement Above Rs.15,000 as Perquisite Under Section 17(2) of Income Tax Act, 1961. Medical reimbursement exceeding Rs.15,000 per annum treated as taxable perquisite is not arbitrary or discriminatory and does not violate Articles 14 or 21 of the Constitution.

13 Nov 2006

The judgment concerns three writ petitions filed by bank employees' associations and an individual officer challenging the constitutional validity of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind — Failure to Consider Petitioner's Application for Documents Renders Detention Invalid. The court held that the detaining authority's failure to consider the petitioner's application dated 2.10.2004 seeking copies of documents vitiated the detention order under Section 3(2) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug Offenders & Dangerous Persons Act, 1981.

17 Aug 2005

The petitioner, Ramesh Ramnath Shetty, challenged a detention order passed by the Commissioner of Police, Brihan Mumbai, on 17th September 2004 under ...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)