KAHC010306832010_1
11 Jul 2014...
Search Results for "agreement under section 34(3)"
274 result(s) found
Found 274 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Arbitration Petition Challenging Arbitral Award on Grounds of Patent Illegality and Public Policy. Court upholds arbitral tribunal's interpretation of partnership deed and findings on dissolution, holding that reappreciation of evidence is not permissible under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
13 Jun 2018The petitioner, Yogendra N. Thakkar, filed an Arbitration Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbi...
- 53
High Court
- 17
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Construction Dispute — Upholds Commercial Court's Refusal to Set Aside Award. NCBS's challenge under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 fails as no grounds under Section 34(2) established.
18 Jun 2026The National Centre for Biological Sciences (NCBS) filed an appeal under Section 37(1)(c) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (A&C Act) agai...
- 55
High Court
Madras High Court Dismisses Tenant's Revision in Rent Control Matter — Concurrent Findings of Eviction Upheld. Tenant's claim of lump-sum lease rejected; failure to register tenancy agreement under Section 4 of Tamil Nadu Act 42 of 2017 leads to eviction under Section 21(2)(a).
22 Jan 2026The case involves a civil revision petition filed by the tenant, E.Mohan Raj, against the concurrent orders of eviction passed by the Rent Court (X Ju...
- 132
High Court
Bombay High Court Division Bench Answers Referred Questions on Adequacy of Protection Under Section 52 of Transfer of Property Act and Grant of Interim Injunctions. The Court Examined Whether Section 52 TP Act Provides Sufficient Safeguard to Deny Injunction Pendente Lite and the Role of Notice Registration Under Section 18 of the Indian Registration Act.
4 Oct 2016The appeal arose from an order of the Trial Court rejecting the appellant's application for temporary injunction in a suit for specific performance of...
- 21
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Construction Dispute — No Patent Illegality Found. Section 37(1)(c) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Court upholds award of ₹3,52,50,404/- for unpaid work, rejecting challenge on grounds of erroneous interpretation of contract and evidence.
18 Jun 2026The National Centre for Biological Sciences (NCBS) filed a commercial appeal under Section 37(1)(c) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, cha...
- 61
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Hears Challenge to Arbitrator's Interlocutory Order on Summoning of Documents. Court Considers Maintainability of Writ Petitions Against Interlocutory Orders Under Articles 226 and 227 in Light of SBP & Co. v. Patel Engineering.
16 Mar 2023The dispute arose between Dodballapur Integrated Textile Park Limited and the claimants, Vinod G. Jain and Premalatha G. Jain, under a sub-lease agree...
- 21
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement to Sell BDA Allotted Site Within Prohibited Period Held Unlawful. Court sets aside decree for specific performance as the agreement violated Rule 18(2) of the Bangalore Development Authority (Allotment of Sites) Rules, 1972, which prohibited alienation for ten years.
18 Jan 2022The case involves a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell a site allotted by the Bangalore Development Authority (BDA). The first defe...
- 313
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petitions Declaring Income Tax Exemption Under Section 96 of RFCTLARR Act, 2013 Applicable to Land Acquisitions Under KIAD Act, 1966. Compensation for Land Acquisition Under State Act Entitled to Same Tax Exemption as Under Central Act.
21 Apr 2022The petitioners, M/s Sri Balaji Corporate Services and NCC Urban Infrastructure Limited, along with individual landowners, challenged the denial of in...
- 115
