Search Results for "advertisements"

467 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 467 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court: Promotional Trailers Do Not Create Contractual Obligations; No Deficiency in Service or Unfair Trade Practice. Creative Freedom in Art Protects Film Producers from Consumer Claims Regarding Missing Promotional Content.

The Supreme Court addressed whether a promotional trailer creates a contractual obligation or leads to an unfair trade practice under the Consumer Pro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction Against YouTuber for Disparaging Marico's Products in Video Review. Court holds that false and malicious statements in product reviews can constitute disparagement, and interim injunction can be granted even if defendant is not a competitor.

The plaintiff, Marico Limited, a company manufacturing and selling various consumer products including hair oils and foods, filed a suit against the d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Advertising Dispute Due to Procedural Irregularity in Lower Appellate Court. Failure to Consider Written Submissions and Denial of Oral Hearing Vitiated the Appellate Judgment.

The appellant, M/s. Navhind Papers and Publication Ltd., a newspaper publisher, filed a suit against the respondents, Akshar Enterprises and its propr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs Implementation of Performing Animals Rules in Films and Advertisements. Court Holds That Mandatory Registration Under Performing Animals (Registration) Rules, 2001 Must Be Complied With Before Depicting Animals in Cinematograph Films.

The Bombay High Court, in a public interest litigation filed by People for Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) and another, considered the grievance t...