Search Results for "administrative inaction"

264 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 264 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Appointment as Senior Scientific Officer Due to Lack of Merit and Delay. Petitioner's claim for notional appointment and seniority rejected as he was not selected on merit and the challenge to selection was belated.

The petitioner, D. Kumar, filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 14.11.2022 passed by the Ce...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Selection Process for Senior Scientific Officer in CFSL — No Evidence of Fraud or Discrimination Found. Petitioner's Allegation of False Experience Certificate Against Selected Candidate Not Proven; Tribunal's Dismissal of Review Application Upheld.

The petitioner, D. Kumar, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 14.11.2022 of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) dismissing his mis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Tahsildar's Endorsement Rejecting Mutation Entry for Land Granted Under Section 94 of Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964. Revenue Authorities Cannot Adjudicate Title or Validity of Grant in Mutation Proceedings; Mutation Entries Are Only for Fiscal Purposes.

The petitioners, five individuals, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Challenge to CAT Order Directing Reconsideration of Induction into Indian Forest Service. Delay in Cadre Review Does Not Extinguish Right of State Forest Officer to Be Considered for Induction Under Regulation 5(3) of IFS (Cadre) Regulations, 1966.

The State of Maharashtra filed two writ petitions challenging a common order dated 9 October 2014 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Bomba...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Promote Inspectors in Seniority Dispute Under Central Excise Recruitment Rules. Inter Se Seniority Must Be Fixed Based on 1959 and 1986 Office Memoranda with Quota Rule Compliance, Rejecting High Court's View on Vacancy Register Irrelevance.

The dispute originated from seniority fixation among Inspectors of Central Excise, recruited through direct recruitment and promotion under the Centra...