Search Results for "Vigilance Manual"

45 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 45 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Head Constable in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Proceedings and Contradictory Witness Testimony. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 8 and 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Sri. Manjanna M.K., a Head Constable at Bagalagunte Police Station, was convicted by the XXIII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows PIL Seeking Scribe Facility for Person with Disability Without Benchmark Disability — Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016. Benchmark Disability Not a Precondition for Reasonable Accommodation in Examinations Under Sections 2(s), 2(t), 3, 16, 17, 20 of RPwD Act, 2016.

The petitioner, Gulshan Kumar, a person with 25% permanent disability due to Focal Hand Dystonia (Writer's Cramp), filed a Public Interest Litigation ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Upholds Conviction of Sub-Engineer in Bribery Case Under Prevention of Corruption Act. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe for Electric Connection Proved Through Trap and Recovery of Tainted Currency Notes.

The appellant, Anil Krishnarao Apashingkar, was a Sub-Engineer with M.S.E.D.C.L. The complainant, Jagannath Rajaram Mane, applied for an electric conn...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Constitutional Validity of Section 53-A CrPC for Medical Examination of Accused in Rape Cases. Challenge to police notice for medical examination dismissed as Section 53-A is not violative of Article 20(3) or Article 21 of the Constitution.

The petitioner, Shreemad Jagadguru Shankaracharya Shree Shree Raghaveshwara Bharati Swamiji, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Enforcement Directorate Appeals in FERA Contravention Cases Due to Lack of Evidence and Limitation. Held that mere suspicion cannot substitute proof and that adjudication proceedings under FERA must be initiated within a reasonable time.

The case involves a batch of appeals filed by the Union of India through the Enforcement Directorate against orders of the Appellate Tribunal for Fore...