Search Results for "Upadhyaksha"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Upadhyaksha"

60 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 60 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Notice for Removal of Gram Panchayat Chairman Due to Lack of Quorum and Non-Compliance with Section 49(2) of Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993. The court held that the Assistant Commissioner must verify quorum before issuing notice for no-confidence motion, and failure to do so renders the notice invalid.

20 Feb 2025

The petitioner, Sri Mahabaleshwar Patil, was the Chairman (Adhyaksha) of Gram Panchayat Halaga, Khanapur Taluk, Belagavi District. He filed a writ pet...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes No-Confidence Motion Against Gram Panchayat President for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Notice Period. Notice period of 15 days under Section 49(2A) of Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993 is mandatory and cannot be waived; motion passed on 14th day invalid.

1 Feb 2025

The petitioner, Smt. Sharanamma, was the President of Hiresingangutti Gram Panchayat. A no-confidence motion was moved against her by 18 members of th...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging No-Confidence Motion Against Gram Panchayat President and Vice President. Court holds that the motion was validly passed by a majority of members and the petitioners failed to establish any procedural irregularity under the Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993.

20 Jan 2025

The petitioners, Sharada (President) and V. Gangadhara (Vice President) of Somasamudra Gram Panchayat, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 22...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Notice for No-Confidence Motion Against Grama Panchayat President Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory 15-Day Notice Period Under Section 49(2A) of Karnataka Grama Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993. The court held that the notice period is mandatory, not directory, and quashed the notice that provided only 7 days instead of the required 15 days.

11 Sep 2019

The judgment pertains to three writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, challenging notices for no-confidence mot...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds No-Confidence Motion Against Gram Panchayat Vice President — Motion Valid Under Section 49(2) of Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993. Notice of Motion Properly Served and Motion Carried by Majority of Members.

26 Jul 2019

The petitioner, Sri R. Chandrahasa, a member of Kesturu Gram Panchayat, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challengi...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging No-Confidence Motion Against President and Vice President of Village Panchayat — Motion Invalid Due to Non-Compliance with Section 49(2) of Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993. The court held that the mandatory 15-day notice period under Section 49(2) was not complied with as the meeting was held only 4 days after the notice.

8 Jan 2019

The petitioners, Mrs. Malathi B Acharya (President) and Mr. Chandrashekar (Vice President) of Bommarabettu Village Panchayat, challenged the no-confid...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging No-Confidence Motion Against Panchayat President and Vice President — Requirement of Prior Notice Under Section 49(2) of Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993 Held Directory. Motion Valid as Substantially Complied With.

8 Jan 2019

The petitioners, Mrs. Malathi B Acharya (President) and Mr. Chandrashekar (Vice President) of Bommarabettu Village Panchayat, challenged the no-confid...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Disqualification of Councilors for Violating Party Whip in Municipal Election — Procedural Lapses and Lack of Opportunity to Show Cause Render Disqualification Order Invalid. The court held that disqualification under the Karnataka Local Authorities (Disqualification of Defection) Act, 1987 requires strict compliance with natural justice and proof of valid whip.

29 Jun 2017

The petitioners, Smt. Hemalata Suguresh Nagaloti and Sri. Hussainsab Shamidsab Bhagwan, were elected councilors of the City Municipal Council, Ilkal, ...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Writ Appeals Challenging Disqualification of Municipal Council Members for Defection. The court upheld the Speaker's order under Section 16 of the Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976, finding that the members had voluntarily given up party membership by contesting as independents.

30 Mar 2017

The case involves two writ appeals filed against the order of a learned Single Judge who upheld the disqualification of certain members of the Town Mu...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Notice for Special Meeting to Consider No-Confidence Motion Against Taluka Panchayat President — Notice Issued by Executive Officer Without Authority Under Section 3(3) of Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993. The court held that only the Prescribed Authority under Section 3(3) of the Act can convene a special meeting for a no-confidence motion, and the Executive Officer's notice was without jurisdiction and void ab initio.

6 Mar 2014

The petitioner, Sri B.V. Krishnareddy, was the President of the Taluka Panchayat, Srinivaspura Taluk, Kolar District. The respondents 3 to 11, who wer...

3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)