Search Results for "UNCITRAL Model Law"

78 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 78 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Termination of E-Ticketing Contract, Directs Parties to Arbitration. Contractual disputes involving disputed questions of fact are not amenable to writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India when an arbitration clause exists.

The Petitioner, a Private Limited Company, challenged the termination notice dated 13.06.2024 issued by the Respondent No.2 – Aurangabad Smart City ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Cross-Appeals Against Remand Order in Arbitration Matter — Power of Appellate Court Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act Examined. The Court held that an appellate court under Section 37 cannot remand a Section 34 petition for fresh hearing but must decide the appeal on merits.

The dispute arose from a development agreement concerning a slum rehabilitation scheme in Mumbai. The appellant, Bombay Slum Redevelopment Corporation...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Arbitration Appointment Case — No Interference Under Article 136. Court Clarifies Scope of Section 11(6A) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Prior to Its Omission by 2019 Amendment.

The Supreme Court dismissed a civil appeal arising from a Special Leave Petition against a High Court decision refusing to appoint an arbitrator under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Contractor/Developer's Challenge to Majority Arbitral Award in Construction Dispute. Court upholds award of Rs.7,35,000, Rs.10,80,000, interest, and costs under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, finding no patent illegality or conflict with public policy.

The petitioner, M/s. Raviuday Construction Co., a partnership firm, challenged a majority arbitral award dated 15 May 2012 passed by a three-member ar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Foreign Award — Part I of Arbitration Act Inapplicable. Section 34 petition under Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 held not maintainable for foreign award with seat in London.

The appeal arose from an order of a learned single Judge of the Bombay High Court dismissing the appellant's arbitration petition under section 34 of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 34 Petitions Challenging Arbitral Awards in Development Agreement Dispute. Court upholds arbitrator's findings on breach of contract and quantum of damages, rejecting grounds of patent illegality and public policy.

The petitioners, Pradyuman Kumar Sharma and Kuber Planters Limited, filed four arbitration petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 9 Petition in International Commercial Arbitration with Foreign Seat. Court holds that Part I of Arbitration Act, 1996 does not apply where seat of arbitration is outside India, and no interim relief can be granted under Section 9.

The petitioner, BG Strategic Advisors, LLC, a Florida corporation, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, see...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal of Anti-Arbitration Injunction in Facilitation Deed Dispute. Court Holds That Arbitral Tribunal Has Competence to Decide Validity of Underlying Agreement Under Section 45 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The appeal arises from a commercial dispute between MSM Satellite (Singapore) Pte Ltd. (Sony) and World Sport Group (Mauritius) Limited (WSG) concerni...