Search Results for "Transferable Development Rights (TDR)"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Transferable Development Rights (TDR)"

112 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 112 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to Deemed Conveyance Under MOFA in Favor of Housing Societies. The Court held that the Competent Authority has jurisdiction to grant deemed conveyance under Section 11 of MOFA even if the developer retains development rights over part of the land.

18 Jun 2026

The Petitioner-Developer, Kiran Builders Pvt. Ltd., challenged an order dated 15 May 2017 passed by the District Deputy Registrar, Co-operative Societ...

High Court

High Court Refers Writ Petition to Larger Bench Due to Conflict on MRTP Act Reservation Lapsing. Dispute Involves Whether Notice Under Section 127 Served Before Plan Revision Lapses Upon Finalisation of Revised Development Plan Under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

27 Mar 2026

The judgment pertains to a writ petition filed by an agriculturist challenging the reservation of his land for a primary school under the Maharashtra ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Appeal Against Refusal of Interim Relief in Redevelopment Dispute. Section 37(2)(b) Appeal Fails as No Prima Facie Case for Injunction Established Due to Unclear Terms and Unregistered Supplemental Agreement.

4 Mar 2025

The Petitioner, Heritage Lifestyles & Developers Pvt. Ltd., a developer, filed an appeal under Section 37(2)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Ac...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Income Tax Case on Development Agreement — Receipt of Rs.1,00,92,750/- Held as Capital Receipt Not Taxable. The court held that the Tribunal erred in interpreting the development agreement and that the compensation for settlement of dispute was a capital receipt under the Income Tax Act, 1961.

19 Apr 2024

The appeal was filed by Sunil Pran Sikand, legal heir of Pran Kishan Sikand, against an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dated 20th S...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Development Charges Demand on Nazul Land for TDR-Based Construction — No Legal Basis for Levy Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code or Nagpur Land Rules. The court held that the Nazul Tahsildar cannot demand development charges for NOC to sell flats constructed using TDR on nazul land as there is no statutory provision authorizing such levy.

1 Feb 2023

The petitioner, Sunil Thapar, owner of nazul Plot No.94 in Ramdaspeth, Nagpur, entered into a development agreement with M/s Raghav Life Spaces on 22 ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partly Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Development Agreement Dispute Between Cooperative Housing Society and Developer. Court Upholds Award on Termination of Agreement and Refund of Deposit but Sets Aside Directions for Possession and Appointment of Receiver.

7 Jan 2020

The judgment arises from two arbitration petitions and a notice of motion filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challe...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Decides Surviving Issue on Interpretation of Government Notification in Land Reservation Dispute. The Court Examines Whether Lessee Entitled to Non-Cash Compensation Under 2004 Notification for Release of Reserved Land for Development.

16 Aug 2018

The writ petition was filed by Mafatlal Industries Limited and its officer seeking directions to enforce a Government Notification dated 10-02-2004 th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Development Right Certificate Issued to Developer. Court holds that issuance of DRC under MRTP Act was valid and no loss to public exchequer was caused.

8 Mar 2017

The petitioner, Mr. Manoj Jaswantlal Kapadia, filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Bombay High Court challenging the issuance of a Developmen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Demolition Notices Issued by Nagpur Improvement Trust for Alleged Unauthorized Construction. Court holds that show cause notices under Section 53 of the Nagpur Improvement Trust Act, 1936 must be served on the owner or person in possession, and that the Trust cannot demolish without giving an opportunity of hearing.

19 Mar 2012

The judgment concerns three writ petitions filed by owners of flats in Nagpur challenging demolition notices issued by the Nagpur Improvement Trust (N...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of Incentive FSI for Redevelopment of Cessed Buildings in Mumbai — Directs Strict Compliance with Safety and Environmental Norms. The court held that DCR 33(7) is valid but must be implemented with safeguards to prevent urban disruption and protect the right to life under Article 21.

17 Oct 2005

The judgment arises from a writ petition filed by three citizens of Mumbai challenging the validity of Development Control Regulation 33(7) which gran...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)