Search Results for "Section 48A"

114 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 114 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Amendment to Stone Crushers Act Reducing Distance from Dams. Court Holds Amendment Within Legislative Competence and Not Violative of Fundamental Rights.

The petitioner, R. Anjaneya Reddy, filed a Public Interest Litigation under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the Karnatak...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Chief Minister's Permission for Development on Recreational Ground in Public Interest Litigation. Section 47 MRTP Act Appeal Allowed Without Proper Application of Mind and Contrary to Development Plan Reservation.

The judgment arises from a public interest litigation filed by residents living around the Cooperage plot in Mumbai, represented by the Oval Cooperage...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes Caste Certificate Cancellation Orders for Violation of Natural Justice. Petitioner's Caste Certificate Cancelled Without Notice or Hearing Under Karnataka Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Other Backward Classes (Regulation of Issuance and Verification of) Act, 2000.

The petitioner, Smt Mallamma, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the orders dated 21.12.2015 an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Writ Petitions by Contractor and Unions Over Payment of Increased Minimum Wages Under Municipal Solid Waste Tender. Dispute Centers on Implementation of General Body Resolution and Notification Under Payment of Wages Act, 1936.

The Bombay High Court, exercising writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, considered a batch of petitions arising from a mun...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Land Tribunal Order in Tenancy Dispute — Failure to Consider Evidence and Provide Opportunity of Hearing. Land Tribunal's order set aside for violating principles of natural justice and ignoring material evidence under the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961.

The petitioners, legal representatives of the original applicant Narasappa, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of In...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Upholds Land Tribunal's Order Granting Occupancy Rights to Tenant in Land Reforms Case. The Court held that the Land Tribunal's finding of tenancy based on evidence cannot be interfered with in writ jurisdiction unless perverse.

The appellant, Sri Admar Mutt, represented by its manager, filed a writ appeal against the judgment of a Single Judge of the Karnataka High Court date...