Search Results for "Section 466"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "Section 466"

251 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 251 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Recalls Winding Up Order and Dismisses Company Petition Under Section 466 of Companies Act, 1956 — Revival of Company Permitted on Payment of All Creditors. Shareholder's Application Allowed as Company Was Profitable and Debt Was Disputed; Principal Debt Already Paid to Legal Heir of Creditor.

8 Oct 2012

The Bombay High Court dealt with an application under Section 466 of the Companies Act, 1956, filed by S. K. Sarpotdar, a shareholder and contributory...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Partially Allows Revision Against Maintenance Enhancement Under Section 125 CrPC — Husband's Income and Dependency Considered. The court reduced the total maintenance from Rs.6,000/- to Rs.4,500/- per month, holding that the Family Court's enhancement was excessive given the husband's income of Rs.15,000/- per month and his responsibility to maintain aged parents.

30 Mar 2026

The applicant, Vijaybhai Bhailalbhai Chavada, filed a Criminal Revision Application under Section 397 read with Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Pr...

Supreme Court

Conviction Under Section 366-A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) Set Aside Due to Lack of Evidence of Inducement or Sexual Intent.

11 Feb 2025

Supreme Court Acquitted the Appellant as the Prosecution Failed to Prove the Victim’s Minority and the Ingredients of Section 366-A IPC Beyond Reaso...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Reference in Corruption Case: Demand Must Be Proved by Direct or Circumstantial Evidence, Not Mere Recovery. Proof of demand is sine qua non for offences under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, and presumption under Section 20 arises only after demand is established.

15 Dec 2022

This reference to a Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court arose from a conflict between three-judge bench decisions regarding the proof of demand of...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Examines Scope of Section 34 Arbitration Act in National Highways Acquisition Disputes - The court considered whether modification of arbitral awards is permissible under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, particularly for compensation awards under the National Highways Act, 1956.

20 Jul 2021

The Supreme Court addressed a significant legal question regarding the scope of judicial intervention under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Concilia...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Proper Investigation — Section 156(3) CrPC Order Set Aside as Magistrate Failed to Apply Judicial Mind. The Court held that the Magistrate must apply judicial mind before ordering investigation under Section 156(3) CrPC and cannot act as a post office.

3 May 2006

The petitioner, Jitendra Chandrakant Mehta, filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court seeking quashing of proceedings arising out of...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order Quashing FIR for Attempt to Murder Based on Compromise. High Court Mechanically Exercised Inherent Powers Under Section 482 CrPC Without Considering Gravity of Offence Under Section 307 IPC and Its Social Impact.

27 Mar 2019

The State of Madhya Pradesh appealed against the High Court's order quashing criminal proceedings against Laxmi Narayan and others for offences under ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint in SARFAESI Act Case — Civil Suit Not Barred Under Section 34 When Challenge is to Mortgage Validity and Bank's Actions, Not Recovery Proceedings. The court held that the bar under Section 34 of the SARFAESI Act does not apply to a suit seeking declaration of title and challenging the validity of a mortgage, as such issues are not within the jurisdiction of the Debt Recovery Tribunal.

16 Jul 2021

The appellant, Smt. Nanjamma, filed a civil suit (O.S.No.3780/2017) before the XXII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru, seeking a dec...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Depreciation Claim Case. Depreciation Being Optional Cannot Be Thrust Upon Assessee When There Is Total Loss Under Section 80IB of Income Tax Act, 1961.

24 Dec 2014

The Revenue appealed against the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal's order allowing the assessee's appeal. The assessee, a company engaged in hotel busine...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Bank's Petition for Commission on Guarantees Issued to Court — Canara Bank Entitled to 3% Commission on Guarantees in Favour of Prothonotary and Senior Master. The court held that a bank issuing guarantees at the request of a customer is entitled to commission as per its standard terms, and the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal erred in denying such commission.

6 May 2014

The petitioner, Canara Bank, a body corporate constituted under the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970, filed a wr...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)