Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Depreciation Claim Case. Depreciation Being Optional Cannot Be Thrust Upon Assessee When There Is Total Loss Under Section 80IB of Income Tax Act, 1961.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: GOA In Favour of Accused
  • 70
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Revenue appealed against the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal's order allowing the assessee's appeal. The assessee, a company engaged in hotel business, filed a return showing total loss of Rs.12,11,91,594/-. The Assessing Officer computed loss after allowing depreciation, rejecting the assessee's contention that depreciation being optional cannot be thrust upon it. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) confirmed the Assessing Officer's order. The Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeal. The High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision, holding that depreciation is optional and cannot be forced on the assessee when there is total loss. The appeal was dismissed.

Headnote

A) Income Tax - Depreciation - Optional Nature - Section 32, Income Tax Act, 1961 - Depreciation is optional and cannot be thrust upon the assessee when the assessee has not claimed it and there is total loss - The Assessing Officer cannot compel the assessee to claim depreciation to reduce the loss - Held that the assessee is entitled to compute loss without claiming depreciation (Paras 1-4).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether depreciation can be thrust upon the assessee when the assessee has not claimed it and there is total loss?

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal dismissed; Tribunal order upheld; depreciation cannot be thrust upon assessee.

Law Points

  • Depreciation is optional
  • cannot be thrust upon assessee
  • Section 80IB deduction
  • loss computation
  • Section 143(1)
  • Section 143(2)
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014 LawText (BOM) (12) 97

TAX APPEAL NO.05 OF 2007

2014-12-24

R.M.BORDE, F.M.REIS

Ms.Asha Desai for the Appellant, Mr.A.F.Diniz for the Respondent

The Commissioner of Income Tax

V.M.Salgaonkar & Brothers Pvt. Ltd.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Tax appeal by Revenue against Tribunal order allowing assessee's appeal on depreciation claim.

Remedy Sought

Revenue sought to set aside Tribunal order and restore Assessing Officer's order.

Filing Reason

Revenue aggrieved by Tribunal allowing assessee's claim that depreciation cannot be thrust upon it.

Previous Decisions

Assessing Officer rejected assessee's contention and computed loss after allowing depreciation; Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) confirmed; Tribunal allowed assessee's appeal.

Issues

Whether depreciation can be thrust upon the assessee when not claimed and there is total loss?

Submissions/Arguments

Assessee argued depreciation is optional and cannot be thrust upon it; Revenue argued depreciation must be allowed as per Act.

Ratio Decidendi

Depreciation under Section 32 of the Income Tax Act is optional and cannot be forced on the assessee when the assessee has not claimed it and there is total loss.

Judgment Excerpts

Depreciation being optional, cannot be thrust upon the assessee. The assessee is entitled to compute loss without claiming depreciation.

Procedural History

Assessee filed return on 31.10.2001; processed under Section 143(1) on 23.09.2002; notice under Section 143(2) on 16.10.2002; Assessing Officer passed order; appeal to CIT(A) dismissed; appeal to Tribunal allowed on 28.06.2006; Revenue filed present appeal.

Acts & Sections

  • Income Tax Act, 1961: Section 80IB, Section 143(1), Section 143(2), Section 32
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Depreciation Claim Case. Depreciation Being Optional Cannot Be Thrust Upon Assessee When There Is Total Loss Under Section 80IB of Income Tax Act, 1961.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Freedom Fighter Category Male Candidate to Fill Vacant Seat in B.V.Sc & A.H. Course Despite Female Reservation Preference. Court Directs University to Admit Petitioner Under Step III of Admission Procedure for Conversion of F...