Search Results for "Section 315 IPC"

130 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 130 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Murder Case Based on Eyewitness Testimony and Medical Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC read with Section 34 IPC Upheld as Concurrent Findings of Fact Are Not Disturbed.

The appeal arises from a conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC for the murder of Sanju. The incident occurred on 31 August 2002 when t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Convictions and Reverses Acquittals in Political Rivalry Murder Case — Witness Testimony and Recoveries Sufficient to Sustain Convictions Under Sections 302, 148, 460 IPC and Section 3 Explosives Substances Act.

The case arises from a political rivalry between CPI(M) and NDF members. On 17.07.2002, an altercation occurred between the deceased (CPI(M)) and A-3 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Foreign Nationals in NDPS Case — No Recovery from Petitioners, Only Co-accused Implicated. Petitioners not named in FIR and no contraband recovered from them, thus Section 37 NDPS Act bar not applicable.

The petitioners, foreign nationals from various countries including Tanzania, Iran, Gujarat, Mumbai, Tamil Nadu, and others, were implicated in a case...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Confiscation of Truck Under UP Excise Act — Collector's Confiscation Power Not Exclusive When Criminal Trial Is Pending. Magistrate Retains Jurisdiction Over Seized Property Under CrPC When IPC Offences Are Also Involved.

The appellant, owner of a truck seized for transporting 154 cartons of illicit liquor along with a country-made pistol and live cartridges, challenged...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Benefit of Juvenile Justice Act — Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Accused Was 17 Years Old at Time of Offence and Entitled to Be Treated as Juvenile Under Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000.

The appellant, Vijay Ramchandra Diwar, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, by the Additional Sessions Judge, Satara, in Se...