Income Tax Appeals by Wipro Limited and Revenue Against Orders of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore for Assessment Years 2001-2002 to 2004-2005
25 Mar 2015...
Search Results for "Section 156 demand"
664 result(s) found
Found 664 result(s)
Tribunals
NCLAT Dismisses Appeal of Operational Creditor in IBC Section 9 Case — Pre-Existing Dispute Regarding Quality of Services Bars CIRP Initiation. The dispute regarding quality of transportation services raised by the Corporate Debtor prior to the demand notice constitutes a pre-existing dispute under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, and the Adjudicating Authority correctly dismissed the application.
4 Sep 2024The appeal was filed by Union Roadways Limited (Operational Creditor) against Ice Steel 1 Private Limited (Corporate Debtor) under Section 61 of the I...
- 138
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Sections 35AA and 35AB of Banking Regulation Act, 1949 and RBI Circular on Stressed Assets Resolution. The Court held that the RBI circular dated 12.02.2018 is valid and not arbitrary, and that the requirement of 100% lender consent for restructuring and mandatory IBC reference for large accounts is within RBI's powers.
2 Apr 2019The present batch of petitions and transferred cases challenged the constitutional validity of Sections 35AA and 35AB of the Banking Regulation Act, 1...
- 239
High Court
- 60
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Order for Violation of Mandatory Procedure Under Section 144B of Income Tax Act, 1961. Failure to Provide Personal Hearing and Proper Opportunity to Respond Renders Assessment Order a Nullity.
7 Mar 2025The petitioner, Madhuri Sameer Gokhale, an individual homemaker, challenged the reassessment order dated 29 March 2022 passed by the National Faceless...
- 1360
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Reserves Order on Petitions to Quash FIRs in Joint Development Project Dispute. Petitions Challenge Three Separate Criminal Proceedings for Breach of Agreement, Cheating, Forgery, and Bribery in Procurement of Occupancy Certificate for Residential Villa Project.
5 Apr 2024The High Court of Karnataka heard three criminal petitions filed by Sri Aditya Kankaria, a director of M/s KSM Niketan Pvt. Ltd., seeking quashing of ...
- 61
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Tax Demand Against Manufacturer for Vehicles Used Within Factory Premises — Motor Vehicles Taxation Act Does Not Apply to Vehicles Not Used on Public Roads. The court held that vehicles used solely within factory premises are not 'used in a public place' under Section 3 of the Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1958, and demand notices issued without jurisdiction and barred by limitation are illegal.
11 Mar 2010The petitioner, Tata Motors Limited, a company registered under the Indian Companies Act, 1913, is engaged in the manufacture and sale of commercial v...
- 75
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Batch of Writ Petitions Concerning Forest Development Tax on Mining Leases Under Karnataka Forest Act, 1963; Constitutional Validity of Section 98A and Notification Examined. The petitioners contended that the notification dated 16.08.2008 and demand of forest development tax from holders of mining leases in forest areas were repugnant to the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 and ultra vires the State's legislative competence.
3 Dec 2015A batch of writ petitions was filed before the High Court of Karnataka under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by various entities inc...
- 71
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Hears Civil Appeals Against SEBI's Attachment Orders – Appellants Challenge Levy of Retrospective Interest on Penalty Without Express Provision in Adjudication Order. The core question was whether the Recovery Officer could demand interest at 12% p.a. from the date of original adjudication orders under Section 28A SEBI Act read with Section 220 Income Tax Act in absence of a prior direction for interest, and whether Explanation 4 inserted in 2019 applies retrospectively to pre-existing orders.
26 Jul 2026The appeals arose from the dismissal by the Securities Appellate Tribunal of challenges to attachment notices issued by the Securities and Exchange Bo...
- 37
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Assessment Order for Violation of Natural Justice in Faceless Assessment Scheme — Mandatory Personal Hearing Under Section 144B(6)(viii) Not Provided. The court held that failure to grant personal hearing as mandated by Section 144B(6)(viii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 renders the assessment order a nullity, and consequently the demand notice and penalty show cause notices are also vitiated.
27 Feb 2025The petitioner, Vimal Trading, a partnership firm engaged in trading and investment in the capital market, filed a nil return of income for Assessment...
- 710
