W.P. (MD) No.35806 of 2025
23 Jul 2026...
Search Results for "Rural Development"
1197 result(s) found
Found 1197 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Issues Comprehensive Guidelines to Combat Child Marriage in India — Emphasizes Constitutional Rights and International Obligations. The Court held that child marriage violates fundamental rights and directed stronger enforcement of the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006, along with preventive and support measures.
18 Oct 2024The Supreme Court of India delivered a landmark judgment in a public interest litigation filed by the Society for Enlightenment and Voluntary Action, ...
- 1352
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Tenure Dispute, Reversing High Court on Urbanization Effect. The Court held that the Delhi Land Reforms Act, 1954, continues to govern land rights even after a notification under Section 507(a) of the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957, urbanizes the area, as the Land Reforms Act is a special law and its provisions are not automatically extinguished.
14 Mar 2023The appeal arose from a judgment of the Division Bench of the High Court of Delhi dated November 22, 2012, which held that upon issuance of a notifica...
- 422
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Corrigendum in Gram Panchayat Road Development Case — Violation of Natural Justice and Ultra Vires Government Resolution. The court held that the corrigendum dated 29.04.2020 modifying the Government Resolution dated 17.03.2020 for internal road development of 127 villages was issued without hearing the Gram Panchayats and is ultra vires.
28 Jan 2021The petitioners, four Gram Panchayats from Osmanabad District, challenged a corrigendum dated 29.04.2020 issued by the Secretary, Rural Development an...
- 16
High Court
Karnataka High Court Quashes Show Cause Notice Against Grama Panchayat Member for Alleged Irregularity in Sanctioning Construction During Previous Term. Notice Issued After Five-Year Gap Held Unreasonable and Barred by Delay and Laches Under Section 43A of Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993.
30 Nov 2016The petitioner, B.N. Krupananda, a member of Basavanahalli Grama Panchayat, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of In...
- 92
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Challenge to Karnataka Administrative Tribunal's Order Concerning Rural Weightage in Police Sub-Inspector Recruitment. Rule 3-B of Karnataka Civil Services (General Recruitment) Rules, 1976, Providing Weightage to Rural Candidates, Was Earlier Declared Void Under Article 13(2) of the Constitution.
20 Feb 2014Background — The High Court of Karnataka heard a batch of writ petitions filed by the State of Karnataka and other petitioners challenging the order...
- 13
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Development Charge Levy in Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act. The court held that the levy is a fee for services rendered and not a tax, and the amendment is within legislative competence.
13 Jun 2005The petitioners, The Solapur Promoters and Builders Association Society and another, challenged the constitutional validity of the Maharashtra Regiona...
- 138
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Inclusion of Villages in Scheduled Areas Under Maharashtra Scheduled Tribes (Regulation of Issuance and Verification of) Certificate Rules, 2003. Court holds that the State Government's notification including villages in scheduled areas is valid and not subject to challenge in writ petitions.
30 Nov -0001The judgment involves three writ petitions filed by Grampanchayats and individuals challenging the inclusion of their villages in scheduled areas unde...
- 84
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Bench at Aurangabad Adjudicates Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Orders of Ombudsman under Mahatma Gandhi Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme. Petitions Filed by Government Servants and Private Individuals Seeking to Quash Recovery and Penalty Orders Passed by Ombudsman.
1 Jan 1970Multiple writ petitions were filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, challenging orders passed by the Ombudsman unde...
- 15
