Search Results for "Rule Returnable"

8513 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 8513 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision of Examination Order in Civil Suit — Right to Begin Evidence Not Absolute. Order 18 Rule 1 CPC permits court to direct which party shall begin, but such order can be reconsidered if circumstances change or if earlier order was passed without hearing the other side.

The petitioners, original defendant nos.1, 2, and 3 in Regular Civil Suit No.273/2013, challenged the order dated 15.10.2018 passed by the Civil Judge...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition, Sets Aside Adjudication Orders for Breach of Natural Justice. Non-Compliance with Tribunal's Remand Directions on Disclosure of Test Reports Amounts to Denial of Fair Hearing Under Article 226 of the Constitution.

The writ petition under Article 226 arose from a dispute over the classification of a product known as 'CHOCOS' manufactured by Kellogg India Private ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Makes Rule Returnable in Writs Seeking Compliance with RBI Master Circular on Loan Restructuring. Petitioners Allege Inability to Comply with Loan Obligations Due to Telecom Industry Downturn, Seek Direction to Banks Under Paragraph 6.4 of RBI Master Circular Dated 1 July 2015.

The petitioner in Writ Petition No. 1893 of 2019, GTL Infrastructure Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, filed a writ petit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging CBEC Circular on Brand Rate of Drawback. Court holds that an exporter can claim Brand Rate of drawback under Rule 7 of the Customs, Central Excise Duties and Service Tax Drawback Rules, 1995 even after availing All Industry Rate under Rule 3.

The petitioner, Alfa Laval (India) Ltd., filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging a Circular dated 30th Decemb...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs Refund of Excess Recovery in Income Tax Stay Matter — Petitioner Voluntarily Paid 20% Demand, Revenue Adjusted Refund Beyond Permitted Limit. Adjustment of Refund Against Stayed Demand Violates Instruction No.1914 and Stay Order Dated 17 April 2024.

The petitioner, an individual, filed his return of income for assessment year 2015-2016 on 28 September 2015, declaring income of Rs.56,65,660/-. The ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Petition of Daily Wager Seeking Regular Pay Scale Under Government Resolution of 17-10-1988. Denial of Regular Time-Scale of Pay to Daily Wager Completing 5, 10, 15 Years of Service Quashed as Illegal and Perverse.

The petitioner, Ranchhodbhai Kalubhai Khant, filed a Special Civil Application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Writ Petition, Sets Aside Civil Judge's Order Rejecting Application for Judgment on Admission Under Order XII Rule 6 of CPC in Property Fraud Case Involving Forged Deeds and Impersonation

The Petitioner, filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the Civil Judge, Thane's order dated 12th September 2...