Search Results for "Rule 222"

658 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 658 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Probate Case, Holding Injunction Not Maintainable in Testamentary Proceedings. Executor Must Seek Property Protection Before Civil Court, Not in Probate Petition Under Indian Succession Act, 1925.

The appellant, Ramchandra Ganpatrao Hande, filed a testamentary petition seeking probate of a will allegedly executed by Sushila Vithalrao Hande on 2 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiff's Interim Injunction in Trademark and Copyright Infringement Suit Due to Suppression of Material Facts. Plaintiff's Conduct of Suppressing Prior User and Earlier Litigation Disentitles It to Equitable Relief Under Trade Marks Act, 1999 and Copyright Act, 1957.

The suit was filed by ITC Limited against NTC Industries Ltd. for trademark and copyright infringement and passing off in relation to cigarettes and t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC030058312022_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Step-Mother's Complaint of Criminal Breach of Trust and Cheating Against Step-Son — Holds Nominee Designation Does Not Confer Beneficial Ownership, But Dispute is Purely Civil in Nature

The petitioner, Mukund Ashok Cairae, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Proc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Quashing Arbitrator's Orders Refusing to Decide Jurisdiction as Preliminary Issue. Arbitrator Must Rule on Jurisdiction at Threshold Under Section 16 of Arbitration Act, 1940.

The petitioner, M/s. Northroof Ventures Private Limited (formerly M/s. Nitesh Housing Developers Pvt. Ltd.), a company incorporated under the Companie...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals in MCOC Act Case Due to Lack of Sufficient Material and Non-Application of Mind in Granting Approval and Sanction. Appellants Discharged Under Section 227 CrPC as Material on Record Did Not Warrant Framing of Charge Under MCOC Act.

The present appeals were filed by Sachin Bansilal Ghaiwal and Umesh Mohan Kirve, who were accused Nos. 3 and 9 respectively in a case registered under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Life Convict's Plea for Concurrent Sentences Under Section 427(2) CrPC - Court Directs Life Sentence and 10-Year RI to Run Concurrently

The petitioner, Mahadev Asaram Sillode, a life convict, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bomba...