Search Results for "Return of Plaint"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to Deemed Conveyance in Favor ...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Act Case — Upholds Appointment ...
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder Under Section 302 I...
High Court of Bombay Quashes Deputy Registrar's Directives in Co-operative Socie...

Search Results for "Return of Plaint"

52 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 52 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Return of Dispute to Civil Court in Co-operative Society Employee Termination Case — Jurisdictional Bar Under Section 91 MCS Act Does Not Preclude Return Under Order VII Rule 10 CPC. The court held that the Co-operative Court lacked jurisdiction over service disputes but could return the plaint under Order VII Rule 10 CPC for presentation before the Civil Court.

6 Aug 2024

The petitioner, Madhukar Mahadev Patil, was an employee of the Sangli Zilla Madhyawarti Sahakari Bank Ltd., a co-operative society. He was terminated ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Civil Revision Against Return of Plaint in Service Dispute — Jurisdiction Clause in Appointment Letter Held Binding. Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause in Appointment Letter Ousts Nagpur Court's Jurisdiction Under Section 9 CPC.

16 Aug 2018

The applicants, HDFC Bank Ltd. and its officers, were the original defendants in a suit filed by the non-applicant, Archana Dongre, seeking a declarat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Against Order Returning Plaint in Property Dispute — Jurisdiction of Civil Court Barred Under Section 163 of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960. Dispute Relating to Property Owned by Cooperative Society Must Be Tried by Cooperative Court, Not Civil Court.

5 Mar 2018

The case involves a civil revision application filed by Sanjivani Kailas Borade (applicant) challenging an order of the District Judge-1, Solapur, dat...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Credit Card Recovery Suit — Bank's Suit Not Barred by Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction as Part of Cause of Action Arose at Bangalore. The Court held that plaint averments regarding issuance of card, place of payment, and agreement to terms at Bangalore constitute part of cause of action under Section 20 CPC.

3 Mar 2017

The appellant, Canara Bank, filed a suit in the Court of Small Causes, Bangalore, for recovery of money against the respondent, Girija Prasad Gupta, a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in Civil Procedure Case — Orders De Novo Trial After Return of Plaint for Lack of Jurisdiction. Suit Must Be Tried Afresh by Correct Court Under Order 7 Rule 10 CPC, as Proceedings Before Court Without Jurisdiction Are Void.

9 Feb 2017

The petitioners, original defendants in Special Civil Suit No. 8/2013, challenged an order dated 4th April 2015 passed by the 2nd Joint Civil Judge Se...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petitions Against Dismissal of Application for Return of Plaint for Want of Pecuniary Jurisdiction. Suit for Permanent Injunction Valued at Rs.1,000 for Non-Agricultural Land Held to Be Under-Valued, Directing Return of Plaint for Presentation Before Proper Court.

16 Dec 2016

The case involves two civil revision petitions filed by the defendants against orders passed by the Civil Judge and JMFC, Banahatti, dismissing their ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Application for Return of Plaint on Pecuniary Jurisdiction Grounds. The court held that the Trial Court must determine jurisdiction based on proper valuation and cannot merely accept the plaintiff's valuation without scrutiny.

13 Jan 2016

The petitioners, defendants in a civil suit, challenged an order of the IV Additional Civil Judge and JMFC, Belgaum, dated 19.09.2014, rejecting their...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition in Trademark Infringement Case — Order Rejecting Rejection of Plaint Set Aside. The court held that the trial court erred in dismissing the application under Order 7 Rule 10 CPC for return of plaint, as the suit lacked cause of action within its territorial jurisdiction.

26 Jun 2015

The petitioner, M/s. Tata SIA Airlines Limited, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order da...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Slum Rehabilitation Dispute, Holding Civil Court Has Jurisdiction to Entertain Suit for Declaration of Rights Under Development Agreement. The Court set aside the order returning plaint, ruling that the Slum Rehabilitation Authority's jurisdiction is limited to statutory functions and does not oust civil court's jurisdiction to adjudicate contractual disputes.

27 Jul 2010

The plaintiff, Bholanath Ramjas Yadav, filed a suit in the City Civil Court, Bombay, seeking a declaration that he is entitled to the benefits of a De...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Return of Plaint in Transport Dispute — Jurisdiction Determined by Place of Wrongful Detention. Order 7 Rule 10 CPC Return of Plaint Set Aside as Trial Court Failed to Consider That Part of Cause of Action Arose Within Its Jurisdiction.

15 Mar 2010

The appellants, Mallikarjun Transport and Chitrarekha Omprakash Khake, were transporters who entered into a contract with Gangapur Cooperative Sugar F...

3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)