Search Results for "Repeal"

256 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 256 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

State Of Maharashtra Could Not Withdraw Tax Exemption Granted Under Package Scheme Of Incentives 1993 By Applying Finance Act 2002 Retrospectively.

Supreme Court Held That Tax Exemption Benefits Accrued Under The Eligibility And Entitlement Certificates Could Not Be Taken Away Retrospectively With...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Delegation of Transport Permits Upheld. Supreme Court validates repeal of the Karnataka Contract Carriages (Acquisition) Act, 1976 and upholds the delegation of permit-granting powers to the Secretary, STA.

Validity of the 2003 Repeal Act – Upheld. The Supreme Court ruled that the Karnataka Legislature had full competence to repeal the 1976 Act without ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Interprets MSMED Act for Dispute Resolution Rights. Clarifying whether unregistered MSMEs under Section 8 can invoke arbitration under Section 18.

Remedies Under the MSMED Act, 2006 Unrestricted by Prior Registration Whether an enterprise not registered under Section 8 of the Micro, Small, and M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

CBI Jurisdiction Upheld – Supreme Court Reinstates FIRs and Chargesheets Against Central Government Employees. State Consent Not Required for CBI Investigation of Central Government Employees – Supreme Court Clarifies Jurisdiction.

Constitution of India, 1950 – Article 226 – Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – Section 482 – Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 – ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Dispute: MP Act, 1983 Not Applicable Where Arbitration Clause Exists. Jurisdictional Objection Cannot Be Raised for First Time Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The appeal arises from a judgment of the Madhya Pradesh High Court affirming the setting aside of an arbitral award under Section 34 of the Arbitratio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Priority to Secured Creditors Over Attached Assets in NSEL Scam Case. Secured Creditors Under SARFAESI Act and RDB Act Have Priority Over Attachments Under PMLA and MPID Act, and Moratorium Under IBC Does Not Bar Execution Against Properties Attached Under MPID Act.

The Supreme Court in this judgment addressed two priority questions of law arising from the NSEL scam, where the petitioner, National Spot Exchange Li...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Rajasthan Discoms Against APTEL Order Granting Change in Law Compensation to Power Generator. Interpretation of PPA Articles 10.2.1 and 10.5.1(ii) regarding supplementary bill and carrying cost is covered by earlier decisions.

The Supreme Court dismissed an appeal filed by Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. and other Rajasthan Discoms against an order of the Appellate Tribunal ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Bombay High Court Dismisses Chamber Summons Filed to Introduce Additional Evidence in Appeal Related to Specific Performance" "Court emphasizes the discretionary nature of Order 41 Rule 27 CPC and deters misuse aimed at prolonging litigation."

The Bombay High Court dismissed a Chamber Summons filed under Order 41 Rule 27(1)(aa) of the CPC by the Appellants seeking to produce additional evide...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Interpretation of "Change in Law" in Mega Power Policy. Defining the implications of policy modifications for Mega Power Projects under competitive bidding framework.

The Supreme Court examined whether a press release from October 1, 2009, announcing modifications to the Mega Power Policy, constituted a "change in l...