Search Results for "Recovery evidence"

7067 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 7067 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incomplete Circumstantial Evidence. Last Seen Theory and Recovery of Articles Insufficient to Sustain Conviction Under Section 302 IPC.

The appellant, Shivaji Vasang Bagale, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Sawantwadi, for the murder of Sudha Puralkar under Section 302 I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Circumstantial Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Conviction under Sections 302, 201, 364, 120-B IPC and Section 3(2)(v) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellants, Sachin Jalindar Chavan and Babasaheb Jalindar Chavan, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Ahmednagar, for the murder of V...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction Under Sections 302, 201, 364 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Motive, Last Seen, and Recovery Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case pertains to the murder of Satyawan, who was allegedly abducted and killed by the appellants due to a debt dispute. The prosecution's case was...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence — Failure to Prove Chain of Circumstances Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Conviction under Sections 302 and 394 IPC Set Aside Due to Lack of Motive, Last Seen Evidence, and Recovery of Articles.

The appellant, Pramil @ Premanand Rao, was convicted by the trial court under Sections 302 and 394 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 for the murder and r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows EPF Recovery Over Bank's Mortgage in Priority Dispute Under Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952. EPF Dues Have Priority Over Secured Creditors Under Section 11 of EPF Act, 1952.

The case involves three writ appeals arising from orders of a learned Single Judge in W.P.Nos.15582 of 2010 and 8686 of 2010 dated 21.06.2011. The app...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Guarantor's Petition in RDB Act Execution Case — Notice Under Section 31A Mandatory. Failure to Serve Notice on Judgment Debtors Before Issuing Recovery Certificate Violates Natural Justice and Section 31A of the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993.

The petitioner, Dr. Sudhakar Borkar, was a guarantor to a loan taken by respondent No.5 (M/s R & S Enterprises) from respondent No.1 (State Bank of In...