Search Results for "Performance Deposit"

1358 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1358 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit Due to Buyer's Acceptance of Refund During Pendency. Acceptance of Refund of Earnest Money Indicates Lack of Readiness and Willingness, Making Suit Not Maintainable Under Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The dispute arose from a suit for specific performance of an Agreement to Sell dated 25th January 2008, executed between the buyer (Respondent No.1) a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Relief from Lis Pendens in Specific Performance Suit — Transfer of Property Act Section 52. Court allows defendant to be relieved from lis pendens upon deposit of Rs.8 lakhs, balancing plaintiff's claim with defendant's right to deal with property.

The appeal arises from a judgment of a learned Single Judge dated 13 September 2013 in a motion taken out by the Appellant, the original Plaintiff, du...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Temporary Injunction in Tender Cancellation Dispute. Court holds that the plaintiff has a prima facie case and balance of convenience in its favor regarding the cancellation of tender acceptance and forfeiture of earnest money.

The appellant, Sunil Mantri Realty Limited, filed an appeal against the order dated 29.09.2009 passed by the learned Joint Civil Judge Senior Division...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Challenging DICGC Act Provisions in Cooperative Bank Deposit Insurance Dispute. Sections 18A(5) and 21(3)(4) of the Deposit Insurance and Credit Guarantee Corporation Act, 1961, held constitutional and not arbitrary.

The appellant, Sri G.K. Gururaja Rao, Secretary of Sri Guru Raghavendra Sahakara Bank Niyamitha, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Consti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Judgment-Debtor's Petition Seeking Rescission of Contract Under Section 28 of Specific Relief Act — Decree-Holder's Failure to Deposit Balance Consideration Within Stipulated Time Gives Right to Rescission, Subsequent Deposit Does Not Extinguish That Right.

The petitioner, T.L. Rajagopal, was the defendant/judgment-debtor in a suit for specific performance of an agreement of sale dated 16.08.1997 filed by...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Possessors to Pay Decretal Amount to Avoid Auction in Execution Proceedings. Decree Holder Cannot Insist on Auction When Possessor Willing to Satisfy Decree Under Order 21 Rules 64 and 83 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

The petitioners, Lalit Malick, Shyam Malick, and Madhu Bhatti, filed a writ petition challenging the execution proceedings of a decree passed in Comme...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Second Appeals in RERA Delayed Possession Matter. Builder Challenges Appellate Tribunal's Direction to Pay Interest at 10.05% p.a. from February 2014.

These Second Appeals were filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay by Runwal Constructions, a registered partnership firm, challenging the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Appeal Against Dismissal of Specific Performance Suit Arising from Joint Development MOU; Developer Seeks Amendment to Include Refund Claim After Dismissal of Suit.

The appeal arose from a commercial suit for specific performance of a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) dated 27.09.2004. The appellant, M/s Whitefiel...