Search Results for "Pecuniary Advantage"

234 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 234 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Insurance Company, Holds Mediclaim Amount Not Deductible from Motor Accident Compensation. Contractual Insurance Benefit Is Independent of Statutory Compensation Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, and Cannot Be Deducted to Avoid Double Recovery.

The Supreme Court in this appeal considered the question whether amounts received by a claimant under a Mediclaim policy are deductible from the compe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Overrules PV Narasimha Rao, Holds Bribery Not Protected by Parliamentary Privilege — Legislators Who Accept Bribes for Speech or Vote Are Not Immune from Prosecution Under Articles 105(2) and 194(2) of the Constitution.

The Supreme Court of India, in a seven-judge bench decision, overruled its earlier majority judgment in PV Narasimha Rao v. State (CBI/SPE) (1998) 4 S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claim — Family Pension Cannot Be Deducted from Loss of Dependency. The Court held that family pension is a separate benefit and not deductible from compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, and applied correct multiplier based on deceased's age.

The appeal was filed by the claimants, the widow and children of Tukaram Mohite, who died in a motor vehicle accident on 22.03.2010. The deceased was ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Acquiring Body's Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Enhancement. Compensation for playground land enhanced from Rs.30 to Rs.102 per sqm based on comparable sales and location advantages under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The appellant, Village Panchayat of Collem, challenged the judgment and award dated 13.01.2010 passed by the Reference Court in Land Acquisition Case ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Uncorroborated Trap Proceedings. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Mahalingappa, a retired Junior Engineer of KPTCL, was convicted by the Special Judge and Principal Sessions Judge, Bidar, in Special Ca...