Search Results for "No-confidence motion"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...

Search Results for "No-confidence motion"

103 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 103 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds No-Confidence Motion Against Gram Panchayat Vice President — Motion Valid Under Section 49(2) of Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993. Notice of Motion Properly Served and Motion Carried by Majority of Members.

26 Jul 2019

The petitioner, Sri R. Chandrahasa, a member of Kesturu Gram Panchayat, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challengi...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes No-Confidence Motion Notice Against Gram Panchayat President Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory 15-Day Notice Period Under Section 49(2) of Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993. Notice Issued on 15.02.2019 for Meeting on 27.02.2019 Violates the 15-Day Requirement.

22 Jul 2019

The petitioner, Sri S Thippeswamy, was the President of Chennammanagathihally Grama Panchayat. The respondents, including the Assistant Commissioner a...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Against No-Confidence Motion in Grama Panchayat — President Failed to Show Procedural Violation Under Section 49(2) of Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993. The court upheld the Single Judge's dismissal of the writ petition challenging the no-confidence motion, as no procedural irregularity was established.

29 May 2019

The appellant, Sri Abdul Khaleel, was elected as President (Adhyaksha) of Kamasamudram Grama Panchayat on 15 July 2015. In December 2018, a no-confide...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging No-Confidence Motion Against Gram Panchayat Adhyaksha. Court holds that the motion was validly passed by a majority of members and the petitioner failed to establish any procedural irregularity under the Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993.

6 Mar 2019

The petitioner, Smt. C. Pushpa, was the Adhyaksha of K. Bettahalli Gram Panchayat. A no-confidence motion was moved against her by the respondents, wh...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging No-Confidence Motion Against President and Vice President of Village Panchayat — Motion Invalid Due to Non-Compliance with Section 49(2) of Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993. The court held that the mandatory 15-day notice period under Section 49(2) was not complied with as the meeting was held only 4 days after the notice.

8 Jan 2019

The petitioners, Mrs. Malathi B Acharya (President) and Mr. Chandrashekar (Vice President) of Bommarabettu Village Panchayat, challenged the no-confid...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Upholds No-Confidence Motion Against Chairman of Cooperative Society — Procedural Compliance Under Section 75 of Goa Cooperative Societies Act, 2001 and Bye-Laws Sufficient. Notice Issued by Assistant Registrar Under Section 77(1)(d) Valid Despite Absence of Specific Time Period for Compliance.

2 May 2017

The petitioner, Shri Bhalbhim T. Malwankar, was the Chairman of the Chapora Boat Owners Cooperative Society. On 24/08/2016, the Assistant Registrar of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Challenging No-Confidence Motion Against Woman Sarpanch. Interpretation of First Proviso to Section 35(3) of Bombay Village Panchayat Act, 1958 requires both that the Sarpanch be a woman and that the office be reserved for women.

5 Jul 2012

The appellant, Rohini w/o Sanjay Bhosale, filed a Letters Patent Appeal before the Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) against the order of a learned...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Additional Commissioner's Order Setting Aside No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch. Notice Requirement Under Section 35(3B) of Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958 Held Directory, Not Mandatory.

20 Jul 2011

The petitioners, five members of Gram Panchayat Bhosa, challenged an order of the Additional Commissioner, Amravati Division, which set aside the Addi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging No-Confidence Motion Against Chairman of Panchayat Samiti — Motion Valid Despite Absence of Members. Section 35 of Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961 does not require quorum for no-confidence meeting; notice properly served.

6 May 2011

The petitioners, six elected members of Panchayat Samiti, Mahagaon, challenged the no-confidence motion passed against the Chairman, respondent no.3, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Notice for Special Meeting of Zilla Parishad to Change Subject Committees — Violation of Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961. Notice Held Vague and Not in Compliance with Section 65 of the Act and Rules.

21 Apr 2011

The petitioner, a Councillor of Zilla Parishad, Amravati, challenged a notice dated 17/2/2011 issued by the President of Zilla Parishad convening a sp...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)