Search Results for "Mesne profit"

222 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 222 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Tenant's Appeal in Eviction Suit — Tenant Fails to Prove Rent Payment and Landlord's Bonafide Need Established. Decree for Possession and Arrears of Rent Upheld Under Section 96 CPC.

The present First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, arises from a judgment and decree dated 31.12.2024 passed by the learn...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals Against Remand Order in Suit for Possession and Mesne Profits — District Judge Exceeded Revisional Jurisdiction by Suo Motu Raising Valuation Issue Without Pleading or Prejudice.

The appellants, as plaintiffs, filed suits before the Civil Judge Junior Division, Nashik, seeking possession of suit property and compensation/mesne ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dharwad Bench Delivers Judgment in Regular First Appeal Against Dismissal of Partition Suit by Trial Court. The suit involved claims of joint family property, partnership business, and allegations of prior partition through relinquishment deeds and gifts.

The case involves a regular first appeal filed by the appellant/plaintiff against the judgment and decree dated 30.11.2013 in O.S.No.248/2006 passed b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Restores Stay for Tenant in Eviction Case Due to Substantial Compliance with Conditional Order. Tenant Directed to Pay Reduced Damages for Remaining Premises Pending Appeal.

The case arises from an eviction suit filed by the respondent-landlord against the appellant-tenant regarding a property comprising a basement and sec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenants' Revision Against Eviction Decree for Landlord's Bonafide Need Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999. Concurrent findings on bonafide need and hardship not interfered with under Section 115 CPC as they were not perverse.

The petitioners, original defendants/tenants, challenged the concurrent eviction decrees passed by the trial court and the first appellate court under...